Blog destinado a divulgar fotografias, pinturas, propagandas, cartões postais, cartazes, filmes, mapas, história, cultura, textos, opiniões, memórias, monumentos, estátuas, objetos, livros, carros, quadrinhos, humor, etc.
quarta-feira, 17 de novembro de 2021
Canto do Lago com Ninféias (Coin du Bassin aux Nymphéas) - Claude Monet
Canto do Lago com Ninféias (Coin du Bassin aux Nymphéas) - Claude Monet
Coleção Privada
OST - 131x88 - 1918
The famed lily pond at Monet’s garden at Giverny provided the subject matter for his most celebrated later canvases, including the resplendent Coin du bassin aux nymphéas from 1918.
The theme of waterlilies—which became not only Monet’s most celebrated series of paintings, but one of the most iconic images of the Impressionist movement—dominated the artist’s work over several decades, recording the changes in his style and his constant pictorial innovations. The present large-scale oil, which dates from 1918, is a powerful testament to Monet’s enduring vision and creativity in his mature years. This work and the related canvases in the series led to the celebrated Grandes Décorations (now in the Musée de l’Orangerie in Paris) which are now considered “the crowning glory of Monet’s career, in which all his work seemed to culminate”.
Three other canvases join the present work in this limited series featuring this specific corner of the artist’s water garden, opposite the Japanese bridge. Arguably the strongest and most luminous of the series, the present work is one of two works from this series in private hands, with W.1878 and W.1879 belonging to the collections of the Musée de Grenoble and Geneva’s Musée d'art et d'histoire, respectively. W.1881, the other painting in private hands, remained unsold in the artist’s lifetime and bears the estate stamp, while the present composition was signed and dated by the artist upon the sale of the work in early 1919.
The present work's surface is a testament to Monet's best canvases of the period. The artist's brushstrokes and thick application of pigment—in almost every color imaginable—yields an almost three-dimensional feeling to the lily pond and the complex flora behind it. The rich impasto found on this canvas speaks to the time and care Monet devoted to this particular work and distinguishes it from the other works in this limited series.
In Coin du bassin aux nymphéas, Monet juxtaposes the waterlilies floating on the lilypond’s surface with the reflections of the trees above. Together with the long fronds of the water grasses, the tendrils of weeping willow and boughs of rambling roses lend a truly dynamic sense of motion to the composition.
Moving towards an increasingly abstract treatment of space, the artist focused on the effect of light and shadow, using the surface of the water to reflect the wealth of color around it and blurring the boundary between the real and the refracted. By obscuring the horizon line, Monet virtually eliminates traditional perspective and instead builds an abbreviated sense of depth through the contrasting patterns and gestural brushwork in the foliage. The richly worked surface becomes a kaleidoscopic tapestry of color and light built upon the contrasts of the sinewy leaves and rounded blossoms.
By 1890, Monet had become financially successful enough to buy the house and large garden at Giverny, which he had rented since 1883. With enormous vigor and determination, he swiftly set about transforming the gardens and creating a large pond, in which waterlilies gradually matured. Once the garden was designed according to the artist’s vision, it offered a boundless source of inspiration, and provided the major themes that dominated the last three decades of Monet’s career. Towards the end of his life, he told a visitor to his studio: “It took me some time to understand my water lilies. I planted them purely for pleasure; I grew them with no thought of painting them. A landscape takes more than a day to get under your skin. And then, all at once I had the revelation–how wonderful my pond was–and reached for my palette. I’ve hardly had any other subject since that moment”.
In 1914, Monet began to conceive of his Grandes Décorations, a sequence of monumental paintings of the gardens that would take his depictions of the waterlily pond in dramatic new directions. The artist envisaged an environment in which the viewer would be completely surrounded by the paintings. He wrote: “The temptation came to me to use this water-lily theme for the decoration of a drawing room: carried along the length of the walls, enveloping the entire interior with its unity, it would produce the illusion of an endless whole, of a watery surface with no horizon and no shore; nerves exhausted by work would relax there, following the restful example of those still waters… a refuge of peaceful meditation in the middle of a flowering aquarium”.
This statement by Monet has often been used to ascribe the conception of his Grandes Décorations to the nineteen-teens. It seems, however, to have been a dream of the artist’s dating back to the 1890s, when his increasing focus on series pictures–such as his Haystacks, Rouen Cathedrals, Japanese Bridges and Mornings on the Seine–saw his creative process and approach to discrete works of art undergo a marked shift.
Daniel Wildenstein explored the artist’s earlier focus on a fully immersive environment of water imagery in his 1996 catalogue raisonné for the artist: “We know this from a letter addressed to G. Geffroy on 30 April 1914. Monet was impatient, having made a ‘false start’ due to ‘a deterioration in the weather; ‘I feel I am undertaking something very important. You will see some old attempts at what I have in mind, which I came across in the basement. Clemenceau has seen them and was bowled over. Anyway, you will see them soon, I hope.’ These lines put an end to all previous speculation on the origins of the Grand Decorations: it was chance, or at least a lucky foray in the storeroom, which resurrected the forgotten first attempts. These were almost certainly the canvases which M. Guillemot had mentioned in 1898. Seeing them again, Monet resolved to exorcise this long-standing temptation by undertaking a large-scale decorative ensemble. If we exempt the few old pictures found in his cellars, we can say with certainty the great work that Monet decided upon on the eve of war, and which was to occupy the remaining years of his life, was begun only in May 1914. As for Clemenceau’s often evoked intervention at this decisive moment–‘Go ahead and stop procrastinating,’ ‘you can still do it, so do it’–the letter to Geffroy clearly confirms Clemenceau’s role and his own account of it”.
Monet became so committed to his Grandes Décorations that he had an additional studio, massive in size, constructed on the Giverny property in 1915. This studio allowed him to move canvases by rope and lever as well as work straight through the winter months when weather prevented long painting sessions out of doors. In warmer temperatures, the artist would continue to station himself at various locations by his lily pond. Monet would work in the morning, returning again after lunch and painting until mid-afternoon, then pausing until the early evening. This schedule was not created due to his own personal predilections but rather to best capture the light and effects of his garden: “He adopted this schedule, not in order to accommodate his visitors nor because he had need of rest, but because the light on the pond was then changing and the lilies were closing up. Once the flowers were closed for the night, Monet would return to work in the evening light. Then the sunset would stain the water with streams of fire and gold, framed in the green reflections of the trees, and dotted with the pale or blueish islands of lily-pads. Once the flowers had closed, the water-lilies lost their fascination as a motif”.
J.C. N. Forestier, botanical correspondent for the review Fermes et Châteaux, wrote the following about Monet’s working methods in 1908: “In this mass of intertwined verdure and foliage… the lilies spread their round leaves and dot the water with a thousand red, pink, yellow and white flowers… The Master often comes here, where the bank of the pond is bordered with thick clumps of irises. His swift, short strokes place brushloads of luminous color as he moves from one place to another, according to the hour…. Monsieur Claude Monet paints not only the landscape, but the hour…. The canvas he visited this morning at dawn is not the same as the canvas we find him working on in the afternoon. In the morning, he records the blossoming of the flowers, and then, once they begin to close, he returns to the charms of the water itself and its shifting reflections, the dark water that trembles beneath the somnolent leaves of the water lilies”.
Monet’s carefully designed garden presented the artist with a micro-cosmos in which he could observe and paint the changes in weather, season and time of day, as well as the ever-changing colors and patterns. John House wrote: “The water garden in a sense bypassed Monet’s long searches of earlier years for a suitable subject to paint. Designed and constantly supervised by the artist himself, and tended by several gardeners, it offered him a motif that was at the same time natural and at his own command—nature re-designed by a temperament. Once again Monet stressed that his real subject when he painted was the light and weather”.
Monet thus paid exacting attention to the details of the garden, including maintaining the pond and plants in a perfect state for painting. Elizabeth Murray writes, “The water gardener would row out in the pond in a small green flat-bottomed boat to clean the entire surface. Any moss, algae, or water grasses which grew from the bottom had to be pulled out. Monet insisted on clarity. Next the gardener would inspect the water lilies themselves. Any yellow leaves or spent blossoms were removed. If the plants had become dusty from vehicles passing by on the Chemin du Roy, the dirt road nearby, the gardener would take a bucket of water and rinse off the leaves and flowers, ensuring that the true colors and beauty would shine forth” .
These large-format canvases which Monet produced during the years of World War I were moved from the lily pond to the new, oversized studio. There Monet would place them next to each other in various combinations towards the goal of finalizing the design for his Grandes Décorations. According to George Shackelford and MaryAnne Stevens “The two-meter square panels were not, themselves, conceived as decorations. They were, on the other hand, the principal explorations of the pattern and color of water, flowers, leaves, trees, foliage, and reflections that served Monet in the elaboration of the three- four- and six-meter wide panels that he prepared for his donation to the state. Once again he used them to explore on a new scale effects that he had treated in the first years of the century…. Carted from the bank of the pond to the large studio, the panels could be placed side-by-side to build up the panoramic views Monet desired for the decorations. Thus, the study of water lilies seen through leaves [W. 1853, Musée d’Orsay, Paris] might have been placed in the studio to the right of one of the portrayals of the massive trunk of a willow so that Monet could transcribe the continuous view that they created on to a lengthy stretch of canvas, which would, in time, be installed as one of the Orangerie decorations”.
A protracted negotiation with Clemenceau over the official donation of Monet’s Grandes Décorations to the French state went on for years. Decisions about the permanent location of these works in Paris was discussed and changed multiple times and a purchase of Monet’s 1866 canvas Femmes au jardin, rejected from the salon of 1867, was required by Monet in order to assure the gift of these canvases. Femmes au jardin (W. 67), was first included in the collection of the Musée de Luxembourg before moving to the Louvre in 1934 and finally being transferred to the Musée d’Orsay in 1986, where it remains to this day. The Grandes Décorations, meanwhile, remained in the artist’s large studio until his death; in his last years he found himself unable to part with them. Some months after his passing, the works were moved from Giverny to Paris where each canvas was photographed in the Cours Visconti at the Musée du Louvre. They were then formally transferred to the Orangerie and mounted in two oval-shaped rooms, lit, as Monet specified, in as close a way to natural light as possible. There they remain today, where the composition on the second wall of the second room displays three combined canvas, together titled Le Matin aux Saules. It is in the leftmost portion that the willow tree and water lilies of the present composition are depicted again in a dazzling array of tonalities, light and shadow.
The Grandes Décorations, along with much of Monet’s late production, would influence artists throughout the following generations. The lasting legacy of Monet’s late work is most clearly seen in the art of the Abstract Expressionists, such as Joan Mitchell, Clyfford Still, Jackson Pollock and Sam Francis, whose bold color palette and rejection of figuration is foreshadowed by Monet’s Nymphéas. In recent years Gerhard Richter’s monumental abstract canvases, such as Cage 6 from 2006, have carried on the tradition established by his artistic forebears. As Jean-Dominique Rey writes: “Late Monet is a mirror in which the future can be read. The generation that, in about 1950, rediscovered it, also taught us how to see it for ourselves. And it was Monet who allowed us to recognize this generation. Osmosis occurred between them. The old man, mad about color, drunk with sensation, fighting with time so as to abolish it and place it in the space that sets it free, atomizing it into a sumptuous bouquet and creating a complete film of a ‘beyond painting,’ remains of consequential relevance today”.
Intent on bringing his masterpieces before the public from late 1918 and early 1919, Monet sold the present work to Bernheim-Jeune and Durand-Ruel, as well as the related canvas from the Coin du bassin series (W.1879) and two Weeping Willows (W.1868-69) solely to Bernheim-Jeune. This marked one of the first times the artist had parted with a group of new canvases since releasing his Venice works to the dealers in 1912. Widely exhibited from that time onward, Coin du bassin aux nymphéas most recently appeared in the acclaimed 2019 Monet: The Late Years show hosted by the Kimbell Art Museum and well as the 2020 Claude Monet: The Truth of Nature exhibition at the Denver Art Museum. It comes to the market for the first time in nearly 25 years.
Vendida por USD 50,820,000 em leilão da Sotheby's.
O Rio Sena em Port-Villez, Notre-Dame-de-la-Mer, França (La Seine à Port-Villez) - Claude Monet
O Rio Sena em Port-Villez, Notre-Dame-de-la-Mer, França (La Seine à Port-Villez) - Claude Monet
Notre-Dame-de-la-Mer - França
Museu d'Orsay, Paris, França
OST - 65x92 - Circa 1890
Port-Villez foi uma antiga comuna francesa na região administrativa da Île-de-France, no departamento de Yvelines. A comuna possuía 164 habitantes segundo o censo de 1990.
Em 1 de janeiro de 2019, passou a formar parte da nova comuna de Notre-Dame-de-la-Mer.
Salgueiros no Sol Poente (Saules au Soleil Couchant) - Claude Monet
Salgueiros no Sol Poente (Saules au Soleil Couchant) - Claude Monet
Coleção privada
OST - 73x92 - 1889
Characterized by a sublime candescence, Claude Monet’s Saules au soleil couchant radiates with the soft hues of spring and exudes a sense of warmth and shimmering light. The directional brushwork and variegated palette lend an ethereal quality for which the artist is best remembered.
Painted in 1889, this luminous canvas captures a small grove of willows overlooking the hills of Port-Villez, just south of Giverny. In 1883, Monet moved to Giverny where he rented a property called Le Presoir. Located about 20 kilometers from his previous home in Vétheuil, this site would become his permanent home, its grounds later proving to be one of the artist’s greatest inspirations and among the most iconic subjects in art history. Before his gardens at Giverny would fully captivate the artist’s attention at the turn of the century, the idyllic expanses along the Seine and Epte rivers served as the centerpiece of his canvases.
The present work and its pendant (W.1241) feature the same copse at right, the paintings distinguished from one another primarily by the length of shadows cast at varying times of day. Rendered in dulcet tones of yellow and rose, the ground, hills and sky meet in striated effusions of color evoking the later works of Mark Rothko.
Around the same time that Saules au soleil couchant was completed, Monet embarked upon one of his most awe-inspiring series of his career, the inimitable Meules. Like the willows which followed, these humble grainstacks were elevated to the level of the divine under Monet’s brush as the forms burst forth in lambent splendor. These serial paintings, first explored in earnest a few years prior, centralized around the idyllic settings near Giverny. After moving further from Paris, Monet divorced himself from painting urban scenes and the banlieue and instead devoted his work to the beloved countryside and its glades of willows and poplars and fields of wheat.
During the second half of the 1880s, Monet’s work was neatly divided between sojourns abroad and his paintings of Giverny. As Claire Joyes writes, “The landscape at Giverny fascinated him. He spent a long while exploring, walking over hills and through valleys, in marshes and meadows, among streams and poplars. Or, drifting down the quiet river in his boat he would watch with a hunter’s concentration for the precise moment when light shimmered on grass or on silver willow leaves or on the surface of the water. Suddenly or by degrees his motif would be revealed to him”.
The period when the present work was created was one of relatively low production for the artist, making Saules au soleil couchant all the more impressive for its accomplishments. Monet’s fervent support for the work of his late friend Édouard Manet took up much of his time and energy during this period. Monet was campaigning to purchase Manet’s scandalous masterpiece Olympia for the French National Museums, thereby preventing its acquisition by an American buyer whose offer of 20,000 francs had tempted Manet’s widow. The artist worked tirelessly to enlist dozens of his fellow artists, dealers and collectors to come together as ‘subscribers’ to raise the funds. Once secured, Monet lobbied for its inclusion in the collection of the Louvre. However, the museum’s rules barred inclusion of works by artists less than ten years passed, and the painting instead went to the Musée du Luxembourg, then Paris’ museum for contemporary art.
The present work has a long and storied provenance. In December 1921, the Japanese businessman and son of a Prime Minister Kōjirō Matsukata acquired Saules au soleil couchant. Matsukata began collecting artwork in London during World War I with a strong emphasis on Western paintings among other genres. Purported to have acquired 10,000 artworks in his lifetime, the shipping magnate aimed to build a museum of European artworks for the Japanese public. In the course of his collecting, Matsukata became friends with Monet and is believed to have purchased more than 30 works by the artist, lending at least 24 of them (the present work included) to the 1924 Georges Petit exhibition in Paris.
By 1927, however, Matsukata’s vision for a museum was derailed. The Shōwa Financial Crisis forced the closure of banks across the country and ultimately led to Matsukata’s resignation from his business and forced sale of his property. Many of the artworks which has been imported to Japan were confiscated by the Jugo Bank and sold in a series of auctions, while those stored in Europe (in order to avoid the 100% import taxes) faced even worse fates. A large, though unconfirmed, number of works stored in London were destroyed in a warehouse fire in 1939. Approximately 400 artworks were left under the care of Léonce Bénédite, director of the Musée du Luxembourg, who had the pieces housed in the Musée Rodin. However, at the end of World War II, these treasures were sequestered by the French government as ‘enemy property.’ Years later in 1959, the majority of the works were returned to the Japanese government, forming the bulk of the present-day Matsukata Collection, the core of the National Museum of Western Art’s collection in Tokyo.
Among the works sold prior to 1959, Saules au soleil couchant has since made its way through various European and Japanese collections. The magnificent landscape comes to auction for the first time in nearly 20 years.
Os Guarda-Chuvas (Les Parapluies) - Pierre Auguste Renoir
Os Guarda-Chuvas (Les Parapluies) - Pierre Auguste Renoir
National Gallery, Londres, Inglaterra
OST - 180x114 - Circa 1881-1886
A pintura mostra uma rua com uma multidão em Paris, sendo que a maioria traz consigo um guarda-chuva. À direita, uma mãe olha para as filhas, todas usando trajes à moda de 1881, para um passeio à tarde. No centro da imagem pode observar-se uma figura feminina, quase escondida, a baixar o seu guarda-chuva, sugerindo que está quase a começar a chover, ou então, que parou de chover. A principal figura feminina à esquerda segura a saia para não a sujar na rua lamacenta e transporta um cesto de chapéus vazio, sem gabardina ou guarda-chuva. A mulher retratada é Suzanne Valadon, assistente de modista e amante de Renoir, frequentemente sua modelo em pinturas.
A pintura em questão começou a ser feita em um período de pintura de Renoir e foi finalizada em outro. Por esse motivo, ela apresenta conflitos de estilo desde a execução. Essa diferença pode ser identificada a partir de uma análise de pigmentação que foi feita na pintura. Identificou-se a sobreposição de dois tons de azul: o cobalto nas camadas inferiores e o ultramarino nas camadas superficiais. Os tons de amarelo também foram dois: o de zinco e o de Nápoles, nas mesmas partes da pintura. As vestes das personagens, por exemplo, estão mais ligadas ao primeiro momento de pintura, datado de 1881 à 1882.
Menina com Cesta de Flores (Jeune Fille à la Corbeille de Fleurs) - Pierre Auguste Renoir
Menina com Cesta de Flores (Jeune Fille à la Corbeille de Fleurs) - Pierre Auguste Renoir
Coleção privada
OST - 81x65 - Circa 1890
McDonnell Douglas A-4 Skyhawk / Caça AF-1 / Marinha do Brasil, Brasil
Fotografia
O McDonnell Douglas A-4 Skyhawk é um avião de ataque naval especialmente desenvolvido para operar a partir de porta-aviões. Desenvolvido nos anos 1950 para a Marinha dos Estados Unidos, o pequeno, econômico, mas versátil Skyhawk continua em uso em diversas forças aéreas do mundo.
Em janeiro de 1952, a equipe de Edward Henry Heinemann (mais conhecido como Ed Heinemann) projetista-chefe da Douglas Aircraft Company (mais tarde McDonnell Douglas) apresentou um projeto para a Marinha dos Estados Unidos em resposta a uma requisição daquela força, que necessitava de uma aeronave de ataque com capacidade nuclear, baseada em porta-aviões, com raio de ação de 555 km, capaz de transportar 908 kg de armamento e atingir velocidades de 805 km/h, pesando até 13.600 kg e que não deveria custar mais de US$1.000.000,00 (um milhão de dólares) por unidade. Para cumprir essas difíceis exigências, o que Heinemann fez foi: peguei o melhor motor a jato, coloquei asas e esqueci o resto (sic). De fato, a "simplicidade" do projeto de Heinemann agradou à Marinha Americana que autorizou a fabricação de 2 protótipos, designados inicialmente como XA4D-1, mas que passsaram logo depois para para XA-4A devido a uma mudança na nomenclatura de aeronaves.
O modelo inicial foi apresentado duas semanas após a primeira avaliação e tinha comprimento de 12,01 m, peso de 5.440 kg, velocidade superior à 950 km/h, carga de armas de 2.250 kg (incluindo artefatos nucleares) e uma envergadura de apenas 8,38 m, o que dispensava a necessidade de asas dobráveis para armazenamento em porta-aviões. O primeiro vôo da nova aeronave aconteceu em 22 de junho de 1954. As dezoito aeronaves de pré-série, conhecidas como YA4D-1 (A-4A), foram seguidas pelo modelo de produção, chamado de A4D-1 (A-4A), que voou em 14 de agosto de 1954. Em 15 de outubro de 1955, apenas dois meses após o seu primeiro vôo, o A4D-1 ou (A-4A) bateu o recorde de velocidade em circuito fechado de 500 km, atingindo 1.118 km/h.
As primeiras unidades começaram a ser entregas para a Marinha Americana em meados de 1956 e entraram em serviço ativo em outubro do mesmo ano. A produção foi mantida até fevereiro de 1979, totalizando 2.960 exemplares construídos em pelo menos 20 versões diferentes. A última versão produzida nova para os norte-americanos foi a A-4M, uma aeronave bastante sofisticada, usada principalmente pelos esquadrões do Corpo de Fuzileiros Navais dos Estados Unidos e o último modelo a sair da linha de montagem foi o A-4KU, uma série especial de 30 aeronaves (mais 6 bipostos TA-4KU) fornecidos para o Kuwait mas que atualmente servem à Marinha do Brasil.
No decorrer de sua carreira, o Skyhawk perdeu a função de ataque nuclear mas ganhou a capacidade para operar em qualquer tempo, sendo que a principal modificação visível foi uma espécie de "corcunda" ou "corcova", introduzida, a partir do modelo A-4F, na parte superior da fuselagem, para receber aviônicos. Os aviões assim fabricados (e os modelos mais antigos que também ganharam a "corcova") ficaram conhecidos como camel (camelo). Mas o A-4 possuía outros apelidos, como bantam (o equivalente em inglês ao peso galo do boxe) e scooter (patinete) uma alusão à grande altura do trem de pouso. Devido ao apelido bantam, alguns pilotos se referiam (referem) ao Skyhawk como galinho-de-briga ou bombardeiro peso galo. Interessante lembrar que o nome Skyhawk significa gavião do céu.
A serviço dos EUA, os Skyhawks continuaram voando na função Agressor para o fuzileiros e para a marinha até o final do século XX. Esta última também operou o aparelho na equipe acrobática Blue Angels e o modelo TA-4J operou nos esquadrões de treinamento avançado até 1999, quando foram substituídos por T-45A Goshawk.
A grande versatilidade do Skyhawk fez dele uma ótima opção para diversas forças aéreas ao redor do mundo, razão pela qual o avião ainda continua em plena atividade no início do século XXI. 2.960 aeronaves foram produzidas.
Pela Força Aérea e Marinha Argentinas, o A-4 teve destacado papel na Guerra das Malvinas. Aeronaves A-4P e A-4Q (A-4B) e A-4C conduziram diversas missões de ataque durante o conflito do Atlântico Sul, geralmente carregando bombas e realizando ataques anti-navio. As aeronaves da Força Aérea Argentina receberam faixas amarelas e posteriormente azul turquesa como forma de identificá-las como "amigas" perante as baterias de artilharia anti-aérea argentinas estacionadas nas ilhas Malvinas durante o conflito.
A Argentina, junto com Israel, foi um dos maiores operadores do Skyhawk. Desde 1998, uma versão modernizada conhecida como A-4AR Fightinghawk está operando pela Força Aérea Argentina. Esta versão está equipada com o radar ARG-1, uma versão do AN/APG-66 do F-16. 36 unidades estão operacionais.
Entre os operadores do A-4 Skyhawk nas suas diversas variantes incluem-se os seguintes países e as seguintes forças armadas: Argentina (Força Aérea e Marinha), Brasil (Marinha), Israel (Força Aérea), Kuwait (Força Aérea), Cingapura (Força Aérea), Austrália (Marinha), Malásia (Força Aérea ), Nova Zelândia (Força Aérea) e EUA (Marinha e Corpo de Fuzileiros).
Antigo Prédio da Rádio Clube PRA-7, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
Ribeirão Preto - SP
Fotografia
A terceira imagem mostra a atual ocupação do imóvel, um estabelecimento que comercializa salgados chamado "O Salgado Genial". Penso ser melhor que o prédio, mesmo desfigurado em sua arquitetura original, continue existindo, gerando empregos e impostos para a cidade. Levando-se em conta que o imóvel não interessou mais a seus ocupantes originais, ao menos não esta abandonado, invadido ou esperando desmoronar, situação da maioria dos imóveis históricos existentes pela cidade.
Nota do blog: Imagens 1 e 2, data 1956, autoria não obtida / Imagem 3, data 2021, crédito para o Google Maps.
Os "Bichos" do Mercado Financeiro - Artigo
Os "Bichos" do Mercado Financeiro - Artigo
Artigo
Muitas pessoas já ganharam na infância um porquinho para guardar suas economias, e a grande maioria não sabe o porquê disso. Esse costume teve início na Idade Média, quando muitos britânicos guardavam suas economias em um pote de barro chamado "pyggs", o que sonoramente se assemelha a pig (porco, em inglês). E foi desse hábito que aprendemos a guardar aquilo que sobra em um cofrinho.
Assim como o porco, o mercado financeiro também utiliza outros animais para designar perfis de investidores, ferramentas e tendências. Urso, tubarão, touro e golfinho são alguns deles.
Entenda o que significa cada animal no mercado:
Tubarão: Tanto no mar como no mercado o seu papel é o mesmo: comandar. O tubarão é utilizado para se referir aos grandes players do mercado que têm o poder de ditar muitos dos rumos da bolsa de valores. Esse tipo de investidor pode se “alimentar” dos acionistas minoritários e, em alguns casos, encurralam os menores para conseguirem lucros maiores. “Esses são os mais difíceis de combater, pois eles querem controlar tudo”, afirma a consultora financeira Eliana Bussinger.
Sardinha: É o avesso do tubarão. As sardinhas do mercado financeiro são o grupo de pequenos investidores em busca de um lucro modesto, quando comparado ao dos grandes players. São esses os acionistas minoritários que, muitas vezes, são “engolidos” pelos tubarões.
Touro: Indica tendência de alta na bolsa (bullish). O termo vem do fato de que quando um touro ataca, ele utiliza seus chifres em um movimento de baixo para cima.
Urso: Ao contrário do touro, o urso aponta para uma queda no mercado de ações (bearish), pois quando ele ataca dá patadas fortes de cima para baixo.
Abutre: Assim como o abutre fica em torno de sua presa quando ela está prestes a morrer, os fundos abutres são aqueles que compram empresas em dificuldades financeiras. Nesse caso, eles compram ações com valores muito baixos ou créditos podres da companhia. “Mas isso já não tem ocorrido muito, devido ao controle mais rígido dos órgãos”, ressalta Eliana.
Borboleta: É o nome utilizado para fazer referência a uma trava utilizada no mercado de opções que forma, no gráfico da ação, uma figura parecida com uma borboleta. A Borboleta é feita a partir do estabelecimento de duas travas: uma de alta e outra de baixa.
Flipper – Golfinho: Assim como seu pulo ocorre de maneira muito rápida, o investidor que realiza esse movimento é aquele que entra em um IPO (Oferta Inicial Pública) e o vende logo em seguida. “Seu único objetivo é comprar e vender de forma rápida, visando um grande lucro”, explica Eliana.
Manada: É o termo utilizado para se referir a vários animais da mesma espécie que costumam se locomover juntos. No mercado de ações, o “efeito manada” descreve um movimento conjunto de vários investidores em determinada direção, sem fundamentos aparentes. Os investidores acabam aderindo a um determinado consenso e partem para a mesma ação, gerando um desequilíbrio na relação de oferta e demanda. E dependendo da situação, essa movimentação pode até gerar uma bolha no mercado.
A Escultura "Touro de Ouro" da Bolsa de Valores, São Paulo, Brasil
A Escultura "Touro de Ouro" da Bolsa de Valores, São Paulo, Brasil
São Paulo - SP
Fotografia
O centro histórico de São Paulo ganhou nesta terça (16) um touro para chamar de seu. Enquanto o país atravessa a pior década da história econômica nacional, juntando os cacos deixados pela pandemia de Covid-19, a Bolsa de Valores brasileira resolveu inaugurar em sua calçada o ‘Touro de Ouro’, para simbolizar a “força do mercado financeiro e do povo brasileiro”.
Réplica do famoso “Touro de Wall Street”, localizado no coração financeiro dos Estados Unidos, a versão brasileira, de 5 metros 1 tonelada, ficará na rua XV de Novembro por três meses. O projeto foi concebido pelo artista plástico Rafael Brancatelli.
Apesar da euforia dos idealizadores durante a inauguração, a escultura foi recebida nas redes sociais (ou seriam redes "antissociais") com pouco entusiasmo: “cafonice”, “brega”, “viralatismo”. O touro que busca demonstrar força e otimismo foi rapidamente associado pelos usuários à atual decadência do mercado de ações brasileiro e do governo do ministro da Economia Paulo Guedes.
Nota do blog 1: Curiosamente, hoje, data de inauguração do "Touro de Ouro", a Bolsa caiu 1,82%...
Nota do blog 2: Diferentemente da maioria das pessoas e das redes sociais, eu acho uma iniciativa legal. Não há dinheiro público envolvido e vai ser mais uma atração no centro da cidade. Vai, no mínimo, gerar boas fotos para quem por lá passar. Penso que criticar tal iniciativa é um contra-senso, desestimula a criação e desenvolvimento de obras de arte pela cidade, além de, em certa medida, ser "viralatismo", pois a maioria dos que criticam, se tivessem oportunidade de visitar Nova York, tirariam foto com a versão de lá (inclusive esperando bastante para isso). Vamos estimular a produção artística e parar de procurar fantasmas onde não existem. Dito isso, só tenho uma coisa a lamentar: vai durar apenas três meses, por mim poderia ficar para sempre no centro. E que venham outras...
Nota do blog 3: Tristemente, a escultura foi vandalizada já no dia seguinte por vagabundos disfarçados de grupos de protesto. E o mesmo vem ocorrendo nos dias seguintes. Esses imbecis acham que a escultura é um "símbolo do capitalismo do mal", uma afronta a eles, e não a querem lá (o problema, aparentemente, não é com a Bolsa de Valores, é apenas com o "Touro de Ouro", esse sim é o responsável pelo "mal"). Aparentemente, só pode haver arte quando aprovado por eles. Dessa forma, tomando por base a inércia das autoridades que tem medo de combater esses vândalos, talvez seja melhor para a escultura sair de lá mesmo. Corre sério risco de atearem fogo nela, similar ao que fizeram com a estátua do Borba Gato...
Nota do blog 4: Hoje, 23/11/2021, a Prefeitura de São Paulo decidiu que o "Touro de Ouro" deveria ser removido. Acharam alguma tecnicalidade para justificar a decisão (normalmente é algo que eles nunca se importam ou fiscalizam, apenas o fazem quando são pressionados). Portanto os idiotas venceram e a cidade perdeu a sua mais nova atração do centro histórico. Assim, com a retirada do "Touro Dourado", acabam-se os protestos contra a fome, a violência, o preço da carne, o preço da gasolina, a alta do dólar, etc. Tudo volta aos trilhos...
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)


