sábado, 2 de janeiro de 2021

Uma Bebida Refrescante (A Refreshing Drink) - Ludwig Deutsch



 

Uma Bebida Refrescante (A Refreshing Drink) - Ludwig Deutsch
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 55x46 - 1891



On the streets of old Cairo in the shade of a gnarled tree, a vendor spoons sahlab or salep into a cup for a fellaheen woman and her child, while a Nubian man and two seated girls drink thirstily. A traditional Egyptian drink popular in winter, sahlab was made by bringing to the boil a mixture of milk, sugar, and orchid tuber powder. The hydrating beverage, which is still enjoyed to this day, would then be served hot with a topping of cinnamon, coconut or nuts.
A related, earlier version of this work, painted in 1886, was sold at Christie’s London in 2005. For both versions, Deutsch would have relied on photographs of individual figures as study aids; however, in the finished compositions, these observations are blended seamlessly to bring the scene alive.

O Guarda do Palácio (The Palace Guard) - Rudolf Ernst



 

O Guarda do Palácio (The Palace Guard) - Rudolf Ernst
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 61x50



In this richly finished work, a man stands tall at the entrance of a Nasrid palace, yielding an Ottoman yataghan and dagger to discourage any trespassers. The man also holds a weapon which appears to be a seventeenth-century Eastern European steel war-hammer, known as a nadziak.
The composition is an interesting mix of architectural and ethnographic elements. The colourful tiles and Moorish decorations recall the melding of styles of the Alhambra palace in Granada, while the metal urn to the right appears to be a late nineteenth-century Indian reproduction of the type sold to Western travellers. No doubt it was one of the many props Ernst himself acquired on his travels and brought home to Paris with him.

sexta-feira, 1 de janeiro de 2021

A Posse de George Washington, Nova, York, Estados Unidos (The Inauguration of George Washington) - James H. Cafferty / Charles G. Rosenberg

 




A Posse de George Washington, Nova, York, Estados Unidos (The Inauguration of George Washington) - James H. Cafferty / Charles G. Rosenberg
Nova York - Estados Unidos
Coleção privada 
OST - 76x63 - Circa 1860

America's first President took the oath of office on April 30, 1789 in New York City on the balcony of the Senate Chamber at Federal Hall on Wall Street. The votes had taken over two months to tally, but when they were all counted, General Washington became the first and only United States President to be unanimously elected by the Electoral College. Washington's inauguration was preceded by a nine-day journey to New York from his home in Mount Vernon, Virginia, and in each town along the way the president-elect was greeted with crowds and ceremony. Inauguration Day began with the ringing of church bells across the city followed by a full ceremonial procession to Federal Hall, during which Washington was escorted by a military contingent of 500 soldiers; the day ended with the citizens of New York celebrating in the streets while fireworks exploded overhead.








Fábrica e Casa em Gloucester, Estados Unidos (Gloucester Factory and House) - Edward Hopper

 



Fábrica e Casa em Gloucester, Estados Unidos (Gloucester Factory and House) - Edward Hopper
Gloucester - Estados Unidos
Aquarela - 35x50 - 1924

Executed during Hopper’s third visit to Gloucester in the summer of 1924, Gloucester House and Factory exemplifies the artist’s watercolors of this period in its careful attention to the classic American architecture as well as its fluid washes in cool tones. The translucency of the watercolor medium, combined with the spontaneity required in execution, proved to be ideally suited to capturing the luminosity Hopper sought – a quality that has become a hallmark of his work. His commitment to commonplace subject matter, which he often infused with a subtle mood of mystery or melancholy, continued to offer his contemporary audience a fresh interpretation of the familiar American scene.

O Pagamento de Dízimos (The Payment of Tithes) - Pieter Bruegel "o Jovem"

 




O Pagamento de Dízimos (The Payment of Tithes) - Pieter Bruegel "o Jovem"
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 78x125 - 1615

The Payment of Tithes, or The Country Lawyer, is a particularly fascinating and unusual subject in Pieter Brueghel the Younger’s oeuvre, since it does not derive from a composition designed either by his father, Pieter Bruegel the Elder, or one of his contemporaries, such as Marten van Cleve. A humorous take on the authority and practice of the law, it was clearly one of Brueghel’s most popular works, attested to by the more than ninety versions that exist, of which almost a quarter are considered autograph. Of these, the present painting is one of the largest and best quality. Dated 1615, it is also one of two of the earliest treatments of the theme, and extensive underdrawing, much visible to the naked eye, reveals numerous small adaptations between the preparation of the design and the painted surface, granting us an insight into Brueghel’s working technique.
Almost all the versions of The Payment of Tithes considered autograph are signed, or signed and dated, indicating that they were produced between 1615 and 1630. Most were executed before 1620 and at least five are dated 1618. Undated paintings may be distinguished by the forms of their signatures: two works bear the ‘Brueghel’ spelling, suggesting dates before 1616, and six are signed ‘Breughel’, the form used by the artist after this date.
Most iterations of the subject by Brueghel and his studio are painted on the smaller standard size panels used in Brueghel’s workshop, measuring around 60 x 80 cm.1 The present work is one of only four that are depicted on a larger scale, however, including the other earliest version; all four of these panels were produced in 1618 or before. A panel of even greater dimensions (115 x 187 cm.), also considered autograph, is dated 1617.
Brueghel used panels of specific dimensions because his designs were transferred using tracings, a subject that has been explored in particular depth in recent scholarship by Christina Currie. The underdrawing visible in the present panel has been executed on the surface of the imprimatura – a preparatory layer brushed over the surface in advance of the painted surface itself – a practice typical of Brueghel and his workshop. Infra-Red Reflectography shows that the underdrawing in the present panel is carried out quite freely but, as with the other larger compositions, the placement of the main outlines was likely guided by a means of mechanical transfer, namely tracing. It is interesting to note, however, that the artist has deviated from the drawn outlines in several areas, most noticeably in the placement of several of the peasants’ feet. Close inspection of the painting also reveals a detail unique to this version of the composition – in all other iterations the lawyer wears a traditional dark mortarboard, whereas here this has been reduced to a skullcap, the form of the mortarboard just visible above this, having been painted out.
There is no doubt that the depiction of this subject benefits from the large size of a panel such as this one. The proliferation of figures, their expressions and interior details are all brought to life in the vivid expression enabled by painting on this scale. The present painting is also characterised by its exceptional condition, rare in a painting of this age and size, with the surface in an excellent state of preservation and the details still legible down to the smallest minutiae. In contrast to other subjects treated by Pieter Brueghel the Younger, versions of The Payment of Tithes are characterised by an emphasis on modelling to achieve three-dimensionality in the figures’ faces, clothes and the objects in the room. This is particularly apparent in the present work in the use of white highlights and graphic formal lines, and may reflect the sculptural, idiosyncratic nature of a lost prototype – the figural and facial types certainly contrast strongly with any found in the work of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, for example.
Unlike many of Pieter Brueghel the Younger’s paintings, which look to his father’s works, the source of a possible prototype for The Payment of Tithes has been the subject of much debate. Jacqueline Folie was the first to suggest that Brueghel may have based his work on a design of French origin - an idea predicated on the fact that the calendar on the wall of the lawyer’s office is written in French and that the short beards and close-cropped hair of the peasants are of a type not seen in the Southern Netherlands at this time. An inventory of the collector Antoinette Wiael, from as early as 1627, also describes a panel painting by the younger Brueghel as ‘een franschen procureur’ (a French lawyer). It has been noted, however, that French was the official language of law in Flanders during Brueghel’s lifetime, and Dirk De Vos and Klaus Ertz both consider the theory possible but speculative, with Ertz attributing the invention of the design to Brueghel the Younger himself in the absence of any more convincing evidence.
The Payment of Tithes is a comment on the venality of the legal profession, and the sense of caricature here is particularly strong, even by comparison with some of the artist’s most satirical subjects. The poor and naïve are at the mercy of the lawyer’s blatant incompetence. Peasants have filed in and wait before his desk, the entire office in disarray and strewn with papers. The lawyer peruses a document, which one of the peasants appears either to be trying to convince him of, or argue against. A clerk sits just inside the door paying no attention to the crowded interior, which consists largely of men in attitudes of apprehension and deference - a couple partially shield their faces with their hats, while one particularly beleaguered-looking man approaches the desk with a dead chicken slung over his arm. Meanwhile a woman hunts inside a large wicker basket to find produce to offer as currency for the lawyer’s services, and a man hides behind the open door of the office, apparently spying through a knot in the wood.
The earliest engraving produced after this composition in reverse, dated 1618, by the
Nuremberg book and art dealer Paulus Fürst, illustrates a pamphlet attacking the corruption of lawyers and their ability to twist the law to their own ends. And the subject’s popularity also reached the Northern Netherlands, where artists such as Pieter de Bloot depicted the same theme in 1628, inscribed with the Dutch equivalent of the proverb: "Go to law for a sheep and lose a cow".

Os Banhos de Mar em Étretat, França (Bathing in Étretat) - Eugène Modeste Edmond Le Poittevin



Os Banhos de Mar em Étretat, França (Bathing in Étretat) - Eugène Modeste Edmond Le Poittevin
Étretat - França
Coleção privada
OST - 63x149 - 1864

The painting Sea Bathing, the Beach at Etretat by Eugène Le Poittevin was thought to have been lost since the fall of Napoleon III – who bought it at the 1865 Salon – when some of his belongings were sold. It was known only from a photograph taken by the art dealers Maison Goupil, from a few drawings by the artist himself, and from the descriptions given by critics at the 1865 Salon, where it was exhibited.
It was however always considered to be his masterpiece, on the same footing as his other large seaside painting, which has almost the same title (Sea Bathing atEtretat; Troyes, Musée des Beaux-Arts et d’Archéologie; inv. 898.2.3) and was painted a year later, no doubt following on directly from the present painting.
All trace of the painting was lost after the proclamation of the Third Republic on 4 September 1870 and the imprisonment and then exile of Napoleon III to England. The emperor’s assets were impounded: some were returned to him (and to the empress) while others were sold. Sea Bathing, the Beach at Etretat was sent for storage to the Garde Meuble, after which it disappeared. The most likely hypothesis is that it was returned to the empress and that she, in exile in Spain at the end of her life, gave it away to her nephews, the Dukes of Alba (see N. Sébille, op. cit.).
Sea Bathing, the Beach at Etretat was exhibited at the 1865 Salon and acquired directly by Emperor Napoleon III himself, an indication of the work’s importance. A couple of years later – although the painting was at that time hanging on the walls of the Palais de l’Elysée, then the imperial residence – members of the paintings jury asked Eugène Le Poittevin to lend Sea Bathing, the Beach at Etretat to the 1867 Exposition Universelle, a remarkable honour and a reminder of the admiration his contemporaries felt for the painting.
More than a simple seaside genre scene, this is an ambitious composition. Despite the interval of 150 years, the artist’s great achievement is still clearly apparent today. Opting for a panoramic format that is astonishing in its originality – and indeed its modernity – Le Poittevin seems to have created, over one and a half metres, a real, almost cinematographic tracking shot along the length of the Etretat beach. Arrayed across it, from left to right, is a throng of figures enjoying themselves: bathers, fashionable women in crinolines, well-dressed men and peddlers.
The more ‘decorative’ elements of the composition all successfully help to evoke the delightful atmosphere of a Normandy summer – from the bathing huts on the right to the splendid still life of heaped clothes and belongings in the foreground, to the lobster pots and the planks of wood laid on the ground, which allowed bathers and walkers to cross over the sand and shingle on the beach.
Better still, Le Poittevin’s ambition seems here to have exceeded the limitations of the simple genre scene. He has sought to go beyond his taste for anecdote by adding an extra dimension to the work, a more social and personal angle. Thanks to Raymond Lindon, who published a long article on the painting in 1967 (op. cit., pp. 349-357), we have every reason to believe that the figures the artist has chosen to feature in the scene are not studio sketches or even anonymous models, but actual portraits of people close to the artist. Lindon, on the basis of an in-depth analysis of the painter’s family and social circle in Normandy, as well as photographs of the period, has convincingly been able to identify most of the protagonists in this charming piece of theatre. Thus, the bearded man in the centre of the composition may well be the painter Charles Landelle (1821-1908); while the other elegant bearded man on the right, reading his newspaper, is probably the illustrator and caricaturist Bertall (1820-1882). Last but certainly not least, note the skinny, lanky young man among the bathers. The painter has shown this still anonymous adolescent just after he has emerged from the sea, in a black bathing costume, wearing a cap, stooping and no doubt shivering from the cold waters of the Channel. This is Guy de Maupassant (1850-1893), Le Poittevin’s great-nephew…
Not only a snapshot of social life under the Second Empire but also an affecting and joyful illustration of the developing leisured society, Sea Bathing, the Beach at Etretat offers a vision that is astonishingly original for its time, in which the bustling protagonists play their part cheerfully, encapsulating the happiness of summer. The artist looks with amusement and benevolence upon the new pastimes of the modern world, with its enthusiasm for escape to fresh air and wide open spaces.



A Onda (The Wave) - Guillaume Seignac



A Onda (The Wave) - Guillaume Seignac
Coleção privada
OST - 64x50


Vista de Tivoli, Itália (View of Tivoli) - Joseph Vernet

 




Vista de Tivoli, Itália (View of Tivoli) - Joseph Vernet
Tivoli - Itália
Coleção privada
OST - 93x122



Joseph Vernet painted View of Tivoli when he returned to France in 1753, after spending more than twenty years in Italy. This is one of the artist’s masterpieces, from his best period. Called back to France by the Crown to paint his foremost work, the Ports of France series, Vernet pays tribute in this ambitious and poetic landscape to the Italy he loved and to which he would never return.
Few paintings of this stature by Vernet have appeared on the art market or at auction in recent years.
Joseph Vernet needs no introduction. He is uncontestably the greatest landscape painter of his generation, and even of the whole eighteenth century. His contemporaries recognised him as such and his reputation has not diminished over time. With his trailblazing vision of nature, he created a bridge between the great masters of classical landscape, Poussin and Claude Lorrain, and the Romanticism that was to come.
Born in 1714 in Avignon, he initially trained locally with the painter Philippe Sauvan (1697-1792) then probably in the studio of Jacques Viali (circa 1650-1745) in Aix-en-Provence. His talent was soon spotted by the Marquis de Caumont, who sponsored him to continue his studies in Italy, where he arrived in November 1734. He remained for nearly two decades, completing his training with Adrien Manglard (1695-1760) and finding inspiration in the examples of Claude Lorrain and Salvator Rosa.
Success came to him quickly and he found a select and wealthy clientele among the British aristocrats who were undertaking the Grand Tour as well as members of the French nobility who had settled in the Eternal City. These clients helped his reputation to grow rapidly beyond the borders of Italy. When he returned to France in 1753, the Crown tasked him with making a series of paintings of French ports: this was his most prestigious commission and it took him nearly fifteen years to complete, while simultaneously pursuing a brilliant career that had both official (he was received into the Académie de Peinture et de Sculpture in 1753) and commercial strands.
Vernet became the reference point throughout Europe for landscape and marine painting. Until his death in 1789, he continued to paint these wonderful landscapes, which were snapped up by wealthy European collectors.
This View of Tivoli is without question one of the most striking examples of his mature work and was painted when he was at the peak of his career, in 1753. This year was a decisive moment in the artist’s life and career, which no doubt partly explains its very high quality and its importance.
1753 was the year that Vernet found his maturity: it was the year his father died and the year he returned to France after twenty years in Italy. It was also the time when his art reached its apogee, just before he received his most distinguished commission, for the Ports of France.
The commission for the present work is precisely documented, since Vernet recorded it himself in his book of accounts, where his commissions are listed: under no. 47 he describes a painting four pieds wide (the width of the present painting) made for ‘M. Regni’, who paid 90 livres for it. Vernet in fact made the painting for François Régny (1706-1779), who was originally from Lyon and became consul of Genoa in 1756.
Régny’s painting was later engraved by Pietro Martini (1738-1797) in the 1770s (see L. Lagrange, op. cit., p. 475), together with its pendant. The two engravings were given imagined titles: View of Spoleto for the present work and View of Porto Ercole for the pendant.
The two paintings subsequently entered the collection of M. Leboeuf, who sold them in 1783 for the very good price of 12,000 livres. They were then added to the collection of François-Antoine Robit and later to the even more distinguished collection of the Duc de Berry. The two pendant paintings were separated in 1837, when the duke sold part of his collection. The second painting has not since resurfaced.
There are few sites that have been depicted at a given time as often as Tivoli was by the artists of the eighteenth century. Around thirty kilometres from Rome, it combined in one place many elements that appealed to landscape painters: a craggy, picturesque panorama, with a village perched at the top of high cliffs, two dramatic waterfalls (the Grand Cascade and the lesser Cascatelle), as well as some memorable Roman ruins, the Maecenas Villa, and the celebrated rotunda Temple of Vesta, situated at the edge of the precipice.
The spectacular character of the ensemble was certainly not lost on Joseph Vernet, who from 1737 returned to Tivoli many times to paint or draw the scenery. His usual practice was to use all the works he produced on site as visual points of reference when he returned to his studio to paint a large canvas of Tivoli. He revisited the subject many times, certainly as a result of commissions from his clients, but probably also because of his own personal preference. There is no doubt whatsoever that the present View of Tivoli is one of the most accomplished and original of these paintings.
Vernet chose to take a step back from the topographic reality of the place, in order to render the picturesque and sublime qualities of the site on the smaller space offered by the canvas. Bringing together various elements that are geographically further apart in reality, Vernet gave himself great freedom and poetic licence, creating an ambitious harmony between topographical accuracy and his monumental vision of nature.
He went further, choosing to create an imaginary location out of two separate places: Tivoli, which dominates in this composition, but also the city of Spoleto, from which he seems to have borrowed some elements that would enhance the picturesque qualities of his vision, including the Ponte delle Torri on the left and the wide access ramp to the village on the right. These minor borrowings explain why, when Pietro Martini made an engraving of Vernet’s painting some decades later, he called it View of Spoleto rather than View of Tivoli, the title which – despite the engraving – Vernet’s painting was always given in early literature.
The idyllic atmosphere that reigns in this work is intensified by the painter’s incomparable pictorial technique and his masterly ability to render elements of nature – above all the water, from the turbulent cascade to the calmer waters in the foreground, as well as the magnificent detail of the rising mist at the foot of the cliffs, but also the sky, with its subtle rendering of the different colours and nuances of the setting sun. Strangely, it was sometimes thought that the painting showed a morning scene (notably in the 1783 sale). But the warm colours and pink tones in the sky on the right, casting a gentle, slightly tawny light over the town, leave no room for doubt. Further evidence is provided by the fishermen in the foreground, bringing in their nets, their basket full of the day’s catch. This is certainly an evening scene.
Using his freedom as a painter to transform the setting, Vernet has created one of the most magnificent compositions of his repertory, both powerful and delicate, realistic and original. The artist is inviting us to join him on a stroll, to visit his painting as though visiting the landscape itself. As we gaze upon this view of Tivoli, we are transported into the idyllic Italy that Vernet loved so much – an Italy reimagined by the artist and idealised through his vision. The year is 1753, when Vernet left the country never to return. Did he have a hunch that he would never go back while he was painting this work? It is certainly true that it is one of first he painted after his return to France: it suggests a splendid farewell and an astonishing tribute to the country he loved so deeply, the source of so much of his inspiration.

O Gabinete do Advogado (The Lawyer's Cabinet) - Dirck van Delen



O Gabinete do Advogado (The Lawyer's Cabinet) - Dirck van Delen
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 44x53

Out of the public eye for over hundred years, and once part of the famous Steengracht van Duivenvoorde-collection, this wonderful atmospheric panel is one of Van Delen’s most accomplished paintings. To this attest also the fact that he has added his name and the date of the painting, 1642, quite extravagantly on the richly decorated wooden fronton, crowned by angels holding a laurel wreath above the doorway on the left.
In a high-ceilinged elegantly paneled room with a black and white-chequered floor, the office of a lawyer, an elegant lady discusses a dossier to a lawyer (or possibly notary). Two commoners await their turn and through the open door another richly dressed lady holding a fan is approaching. To the right a clerk is writing up papers while two servants deliver goods such as a hare into a basket. Two children are chasing each other in the front, with a boy holding a mask, as a kind of repoussoir pulling our eye towards the central plan.
At least two paintings, near contemporary, can be discerned above the paneling in the room: a what could be a panoramic, large Hercules Seghers landscape in the centre, and to the right, more difficult to discern, a work depicting a possible sorceress.
The fanciful architecture of the room, inventively combining rich Baroque motifs, such as the sculpted wooden reliefs and the carefully worked out room details, is minutely rendered and possesses the glossy finish typical of Van Delen’s best works from the early 1640s. The subtle treatment of the light, such as that flooding in from the tall windows on the right, silhouetting the two children playing in the foreground, creates masterful chiaroscuro that enhances the atmosphere of the scene. Van Delen has composed this picture in a doubtless conscious evocation of a stage set: in fact the space depicted becomes cogent as if seen through an invisible proscenium arch, the foreground – and presumably us the audience – in shadow, with the actors illuminated theatrically by the strong daylight from the right. It is tempting to assume that Van Delen had in mind the Peasant Lawyer composition by Pieter Brueghel the Younger (1564-1636) – given the numbers in which these were produced, it is likely that Van Delen would have been familiar with them. Though set in much more humble surroundings, Brueghel’s organization of his scene offers a clear prototype, with the lawyer seated at his desk at the right, promissory notes and other paperwork pinned to the wall beyond, and clients or supplicants, including an old man leaning on a stick, another holding his hat respectfully and a third bringing produce as payment, having entered from a doorway to the left. Both artists present a moment in a theatrical narrative, although their pictorial technique is so different that it is hard to believe that Pieter Brueghel the Younger was painting his Peasant Lawyer pictures twenty years and less before Van Delen’s masterpiece: they seem to belong to different centuries, and in terms of their pictorial tradition, they do. Different too is the richly attired couple seen in an alcove occupying the centre of the back of the room in Van Delen’s painting. One wonders if they might be having a betrothal agreement drawn up.
Active in the city of Arnemuiden near Middelburg, Dirck van Delen specialized in these highly polished renditions of imaginary architectural scenes and, very much in the practice of the day, he joined forces with various figure painters to populate his grand interiors. His collaboration with Dirck Hals in Haarlem and with the Delft artist Anthonie Palamedesz. (1602-1673) is well documented; the lively figures in the present panel are probably the latter painter’s skillful work.
As often during this period, Van Delen and Palamedesz. have probably been inspired by several iconographic sources. Thus, the centre of the composition, with the figures of the lawyers and the main protagonists, is clearly related to the engraving by Abraham Bosse.

A Colheita de Vinho (The Wine Harvest) - David Teniers






A Colheita de Vinho (The Wine Harvest) - David Teniers
Coleção privada
OST - 142x267