domingo, 30 de janeiro de 2022

Madona e Criança / Madona de Phillips (The Madonna and Child at a Ledge with an Apple / "The Philips Madonna") - Giovanni Bellini

 







Madona e Criança / Madona de Phillips (The Madonna and Child at a Ledge with an Apple / "The Philips Madonna") - Giovanni Bellini
Coleção privada
Têmpera e óleo sobre painel - 76x53

Giovanni Bellini, more than any other Venetian painter of his generation, realized the full artistic potential of the Renaissance, becoming in a real sense the father of the golden age of Venetian painting. In addition to numerous “belliniani”—apprentices who would later become independent masters in their own right—he trained some of the greatest artistic geniuses of the early sixteenth century. Cima da Conegliano, Lorenzo Lotto, Sebastiano del Piombo and, most importantly, Titian, were all pupils of Bellini. His long career charts the progress of Venetian painting from a late gothic to a modern, classical style, without which the masterpieces of Giorgione and Titian would not have been possible.
Of all the subjects favored by Giovanni Bellini, his depictions of the Madonna and Child have been perhaps the most prized by collectors. This Madonna and Child is a key early work by the artist. It has been dated by Mauro Lucco to circa 1460, just after Bellini set up an independent workshop in 1459 in the parish of San Lio, near the Rialto Bridge. Even at this early date, Bellini’s progressive approach to the subject is evident. The gold ground on which the image is painted represents a conservative trend still prevalent in Venetian painting in the mid-fifteenth century, espoused by the rival Vivarini family of painters; it harkens back to Venice’s enduring relationship with the art of the Greek east. However, the dynamism of the pose of the figure of the infant Christ in this painting demonstrates Bellini’s awareness of the “new style” being formulated throughout Italy. The composition echoes the terracotta reliefs of this same theme by Donatello, whose own work had made such an impression in Venetian artistic circles during the previous two decades. Indeed, Mauro Lucco has recently connected the pose of the bambino with that of one of the putti in the so-called “Trono di Saturno,” a pair of ancient reliefs that decorated an archway between Piazza San Marco and the Frezzaria which furnished inspiration not just for Donatello, but also Mantegna, Titian and Sansovino.
While known to scholars, this Madonna and Child has been largely inaccessible for the last century. It was acquired by Anton Philips (1874-1951), the great entrepreneur and co-founder of Royal Philips Electronics from the famous Munich dealer, Julius Böhler, after which it has remained in the family’s collection. Most modern scholars have known it only through old black and white photographs, likely taken when the painting was in the collection of Charles Loeser in Florence, or shortly thereafter. The earliest images of the painting show later enhancements, likely made in the 19th century: a band of pseudo-kufic decoration interspersed with pearl rosettes was along the edge of the Virgin’s mantle (indeed, a small section of this has been purposefully left at foot of the Infant Christ lower right). The plain, mulberry tunic of the Madonna was also covered with a pomegranate/damask design. These later additions were removed in the first half of the twentieth century, to reveal the artist’s original intent. However, these accretions no doubt caused some confusion amongst scholars who were studying the picture only in photographs. Except for the engraved reproduction of the image published by Salomon Reinach, the painting was only reproduced in print by Gronau in 1930, who himself commented he had never seen the original. This inaccessibility led to a wide variety of opinions on the painting, from variations in dating, to the painting being a studio work, and even a suggested attribution to Bellini’s contemporary, Lazzaro Bastiani by Anchise Tempestini. Federico Zeri rejected that assertion, and considered it to be from the “stretto ambito di Giovanni Bellini,” while Jean Paris restituted the painting to Giovanni Bellini himself. Bernard Berenson, presumably one of the few scholars who had seen the painting first hand when it was in the Loeser collection in Florence, had already given it to the young Bellini, according to Reinach in 1910, and it appears in his 1957 lists.
Most recently, in writing his definitive catalogue raisonné on the works of Bellini, Mauro Lucco was able to examine the painting firsthand in February 2016 together with Peter Humfrey after its recent restoration. Like Berenson, Lucco considers this an early work, and places it at the very beginning of Bellini’s canon. He notes that the photographs he had himself previously seen were not indicative of the painting’s “level of quality and invention.” Stylistically, it reflects the moment when the young Bellini, still influenced by Jacopo, is beginning to “trovare la sua propria strada.” It would appear to date to slightly later than a Madonna and Child in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (inv. no. M.85.223) which has generally in the past been given to Jacopo Bellini, but which he and Humfrey now consider to be by the young Giovanni. The facial type of the Madonna and especially of the Infant Christ in both works are clearly analogous. However, the present panel would appear to antedate other Madonne by Bellini, including ones in the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam and the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin showing a similar approach to the subject, with the Virgin standing at a parapet, an apple emblematic of the original sin placed on the ledge in the front right foreground.

Diógenes com sua Lanterna Procurando um Homem Honesto (Diogenes with his Lantern Looking for an Honest Man) - Pieter van Mol

 







Diógenes com sua Lanterna Procurando um Homem Honesto (Diogenes with his Lantern Looking for an Honest Man) - Pieter van Mol
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 65x84


This arresting Flemish Caravaggesque painting of Diogenes looking for an Honest Man is an unrivalled masterpiece from the brush of Pieter van Mol, a relatively unknown artist from the orbit of Rubens in Antwerp. Perhaps the reason for Van Mol’s obscurity is the fact that he spent most of his career working in Paris and not in his native Antwerp. Born nearly eight months after Van Dyck in Antwerp in 1599, Van Mol likely apprenticed with Artus Wolffert. and probably accompanied Rubens to Paris in 1625, when the master travelled there for the commission of the Medici Cycle in the Luxembourg Palace. Van Mol found success in Paris, as he received many commissions in the French capital and became court painter to the King (1637) and Queen (1642) of France; in 1648 the painter was among the founding members of the Académie Royale des Beaux-Arts.
While Van Mol’s oeuvre is replete with paintings of excellent quality, this picture is surely the artist’s strongest work. It was a celebrated treasure in several prominent French collections, beginning with Paul-Henri-Thiry, baron d’Holbach, a French-German author and Enlightenment philosopher. The painting was twice purchased at auction by famous collector and dealer Jean-Baptiste-Pierre Le Brun, the husband of celebrated portraitist Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun. It also belonged to François-Pascal Haudry, called Président Haudry, the president of the finance bureau in Orléans and owner of one of the best art collections outside of Paris. Around 1804 the present lot entered the collection of Lucien Bonaparte, who brought it from Paris to Rome during his self-imposed exile in The Eternal City. In a list of Bonaparte’s collection compiled in 1804, the painting is described as hanging in the most important room, the “Prima Sallone.” In the first catalogue of this collection from 1808, there appears an engraving after the painting by Giovanni Folo. Lucien then escaped to Britain in 1809 but returned to Rome after his brother’s abdication in 1814. He retained his collection as long as he could, but financial pressures forced him to apply for an export permit for this painting in 1825. At that time the picture was almost certainly shipped back to Paris, where it was purchased by Baron de Rothschild and remained in the Rothschild family for over 170 years, until its sale at Sotheby’s New York in 1997, when it was purchased by the present owner.
Although this is Van Mol’s masterpiece it fits into his oeuvre quite comfortably. A large painting by Van Mol in Orléans depicts the same subject and includes a similar grizzly and grey-bearded old man as the figure of Diogenes, again holding the lantern. In fact, the waves in the hair and beard in both portrayals are nearly identical, suggesting that Van Mol might have been working from a sketch after life that he prepared beforehand. A candidate for this sketch is the study in the museum in Rouen. The artist worked out this revision of the subject very carefully, as demonstrated by a preparatory drawing in Frankfurt, also at knee-length.
As inspiration for the present painting, Van Mol could have recalled several sketches by Rubens. The bearded man on the far left could refer back to the first head on the left in Rubens’ Head Studies of Bearded Man in Libourne, while the old woman in the center could have its roots in Rubens’ Study of an Old Woman, which sold at Sotheby’s London in 2017. Finally, the bearded old man who served as the model of Diogenes harks back to several sketches by Rubens, such as the figure on the right in the double head study in Dayton. In all of these borrowings Van Mol is not slavishly imitating Rubens. Instead, he is emulating the great master and seamlessly integrating these influences into a work that is entirely his own.
Diogenes of Sinope was an ancient Greek philosopher from the 4th century B.C. and founder of the Cynic school of philosophy; he despised wealth and would walk around Athens begging in public, openly criticizing those whom he encountered, and so it is said “paying homage to no one,” not even Alexander the Great, whom he boldly asked to step aside, out of the path of his sunlight. His life was documented by his namesake, Diogenes Laërtius, in the Lives of the Philosophers, which appeared in an Italian edition in Venice in 1611 (Dell vite de’ filosofi di Dioigenes Laertio). In this text it is explained that Diogenes “walked around with a lantern by day and said, ''I am looking for an [honest] man.” The narrative was only occasionally depicted in Flemish Baroque art, although as we know Van Mol painted the story at least twice.
Although largely preserved in private collections for most of its history, this painting was copied on canvas, probably when the original was still in France in the 17th century, assuming that the artist brought it with him when he moved from Antwerp to Paris, or indeed if he executed the outstanding original during his French period.

Maria Madalena Segurando um Pote de Pomada (Mary Magdalene Holding an Ointment Jar) - Ambrosius Benson







Maria Madalena Segurando um Pote de Pomada (Mary Magdalene Holding an Ointment Jar) - Ambrosius Benson
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 68x49

As Georges Marlier notes in his monograph devoted to Ambrosius Benson, the Magdalene in this attractive painting is more the elegant grand dame of her day than penitent saint. Her beautiful figure derives from one of the sibyls in Benson’s Deipara Virgo (Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten, Antwerp). The design was evidently very popular as Benson used it on several occasions as a single sibyl, or as the Magdalene, either holding an ointment jar, as in this painting, or reading. An important example of the latter type was sold London, Sotheby’s, 5 December 2018, lot 1. The versions that survive attest to the theme’s popularity around 1530. Benson was one of the most popular, and prolific, painters of the Renaissance in the north, successfully fusing the art of his north Italian origins with the precision and delicacy of his Netherlandish peers.
The present work relates most closely in physiognomy and attributes to a painting of the Magdalene holding an ointment jar in the Groeningemuseum, Bruges, which Friedländer lists as the first version of this compositional type. Friedländer lists four versions in total, with a third of comparable quality in Hampton Court. The beautifully refined spotted fur sleeves in the present composition are unique within this specific composition in which the Magdalene holds a jar of ointment, though is similarly found in the aforementioned Sotheby’s 2018 variant where she holds a book.
A comparison between this Magdalene, Benson’s sibyl in the Antwerp painting, and other images of the saint shows similarities in dress – notably the fur sleeves – as well as numerous differences. Most striking is the substitution of the headdress for the diaphanous confection worn by the Magdalene in the present work. Here, semi-transparent veils designed to off-set the fine detail of her hair and the effect of layered gauze are held in place by a gold-embroidered head band. Another distinctive feature of the work is the design of the jeweled brooch, with its prominent white pearls and large central stone, which differentiates it from other images of the Magdalene. For instance, the Bruges version features no pendant at all, but rather a more modest and simple gold necklace.
Benson developed his style in Bruges amidst a highly developed and collaborative artistic environment. Lombard in origin, he is recorded in Bruges as early as 1518, the year he entered Gerard David’s studio, which served as the training ground and source of inspiration for a plethora of painters who form part of a great generation of Bruges artists. In addition to his main competitor, Adriaen Isenbrandt, Benson rose to European prominence alongside several successful painters, including the miniaturist and illuminator Simon Bening, as well as Jan Provost, Albrecht Cornelis and Lancelot Blondeel, among others. In addition to the group of known artists, numerous others are known to have been active, a realization illustrated by the fact that from 1500 to 1523 (the year of David’s death), no less than sixty three people registered as free painters in the Bruges guild.

 

Congestionamento no Aterro do Flamengo, 1960, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

 


Congestionamento no Aterro do Flamengo, 1960, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Fotografia

Jardim Público, Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, São Paulo, Brasil


 

Jardim Público, Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, São Paulo, Brasil
Santa Rita do Passa Quatro - SP
Fotografia

Prato Medalhão em Porcelana, Limoges, França


 

Prato Medalhão em Porcelana, Limoges, França
Fotografia


Belíssimo medalhão em porcelana francesa Limoges, marcada no verso, em tom azul cobalto com decoração de cena de damas em prosa assinada pelo pintor Roland, borda filetada a ouro 22K em relevo com motivo floral e pássaros. Diâmetro: 22 cm.

Prato Medalhão em Porcelana, Limoges, França

 


Prato Medalhão em Porcelana, Limoges, França
Fotografia


Belíssimo medalhão em porcelana francesa Limoges, marcada no verso, em tom azul cobalto com decoração de cena de damas em prosa assinada pelo pintor Roland, borda filetada a ouro 22K em relevo com motivo floral e pássaros. Diâmetro: 23,5 cm.

Prato Decorativo Representando "A Última Ceia" de Leonardo da Vinci, Real São Paulo, Mauá, São Paulo, Brasil


 

Prato Decorativo Representando "A Última Ceia" de Leonardo da Vinci, Real São Paulo, Mauá, São Paulo, Brasil
Fotografia

Antigo Banco Construtor, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil


 

Antigo Banco Construtor, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
Ribeirão Preto - SP
Fotografia


A Companhia Comércio Indústria “Antonio Diederichsen”, na época, era o maior e mais diversificado estabelecimento comercial de Ribeirão Preto e região. Vendia, principalmente, material de construção, artigos para presentes, eletrodomésticos e automóveis.
Destaque para os diretores e antigos funcionários: Antônio Diederichsen (Diretor-Presidente e Fundador); Manoel Penna (Diretor Gerente); João Marzola (Diretor Auxiliar); Ângelo Egydio Pedreschi (Contador e Chefe do Escritório); Pedro José Michelazzo (Caixa-Geral); Athanasio Saltão Filho ( Correntista); Wenceslau Michelutti (Diarista no Escritório); Antônio de Pádua Loboschi (Chefe da Secção de Pessoal); Clóvis José Alonso (Chefe da Secção de Seguros e de Capitalização); Waldemiro Diniz Guimarães (Chefe da Secção de Artigos Elétricos); Guilherme Faim (Chefe da Secção de Expedição); Palmo Sampaio (Vendedor-Pracista); Nicanor Ferreira Vianna (Subgerente das Secções de Vendas); Euclides Ferreira Vianna (Chefe da Secção de Louças e Artigos Finos para Presentes); Ernesto Tonzar (Chefe da Secção de Ferragens); José da Cunha Sarmento (Viajante); Henrique Pierotti (Chefe da Secção de Automóveis); Luís Ferrero (Chefe da Oficina Mecânica – Automóveis); José Augusto Costa (Chefe do Posto de Serviço e Lubrificação de Autos), Antonio Roteta (Chefe da Seção de Peças para Automóveis); Luiz Bulgarelli (Chefe da Oficina Mecânica e Fábrica de Parafusos); Guido Gambini (Chefe da Secção Serraria); José Hermoso (Mestre-mecânico da Oficina Ford) e Arnaud Capuzzo (Contra-mestre da Oficina Ford).
História da organização, a partir da vinda para o Brasil de Bernardo Diederichsen, pai do fundador: Veio com uma irmã, cujo marido fora nomeado gerente da firma “Theodor Wille”, no Rio de Janeiro, onde o casal desembarcou. Bernardo e outros amigos seguiram para Santos, onde um irmão era gerente da “Theodor Wille”. Trabalhou na construção da Estrada de Ferro Santos-Jundiaí e, em Campinas, na fazenda da Baronesa de Souza Aranha. Depois foi trabalhar na fazenda “Garrafão”, nas encostas das Agulhas Negras, local em que veio conhecer a sobrinha do dono, Ana Carolina, com quem se casou, passando a trabalhar na cultura de fumo do sogro Antônio da Rocha Leão, próximo à Itatiaia. Depois que uma praga atingiu essa cultura, o casal e os sogros mudaram-se para S.Paulo, adquirindo a fazenda “Morumbi”. Em 1º de agosto de 1875, em residência da rua Direita, nasceu o filho de Bernardo e Ana Carolina, de nome Antônio. Aos 7 anos, foi o menino internado no Colégio Brasileiro-Alemão, na rua Florêncio de Abreu. Dos 9 aos 18 viveu com um tio em Hamburgo, na Alemanha, aprendendo o alemão, inglês e francês. Retornando ao Brasil, ficou na fazenda “Morumbi”, como uma espécie de administrador. Um ano depois, voltou para a Alemanha, agora para estudar agronomia. Trabalhou em propriedades rurais em Holstein, em Netelau. Enquanto praticava no campo, fazia estudos teóricos, por correspondência, na Escola Agrícola de Schenwalde, prestando exames anuais. Ao chegar da Alemanha, trazendo o diploma e algumas economias dos salários ganhos em Netelau, veio para a fazenda “Santa Adelaide”, neste município, de propriedade de seu primo Arthur de Aguiar Diederichsen, onde passou a ser ajudante do administrador Salvador Carlos de Almeida. Da “Santa Adelaide”, Antônio foi para a fazenda “Retiro do Desengano”, em Batatais, também de Arthur e de seu sócio Dr. Alfredo Jordão. A fazenda virou modelo e tinha vida financeira própria. Em 1903, o café estava em crise e o gerente da empresa, Francisco Whitaker, chegou à fazenda “Retiro do Desengano” para cortar despesas. Para poupar os funcionários da dispensa, Antônio pediu demissão disposto a dedicar-se a outra atividade. Em São Paulo, ficou sabendo que o Sr. Ruppe, gerente do Banco Brasileiro-Alemão estava necessitando de uma pessoa capaz de levantar um inventário das fazendas que estavam em débito para com o banco. Iniciou o trabalho na Sorocabana. Completou o trabalho em 30 dias. Sabendo da falência do estabelecimento comerial Banco Construtor e Auxiliar de Santos, que havia montado em Ribeirão Preto uma oficina mecânica, uma fundição e uma serraria, para atender às lavouras e às máquinas de beneficiar café, bem como para vender utensílios para construção e trabalho rural, Antônio Diederichsen aguardou o leilão da massa falida, que seria no Forum de Santos. Como não entendia nada do ramo, propôs sociedade a João Hibbeln, que tinha arrendado a serraria da organização falida. Depois de algumas démarches acabou ficando com o negócio e, assim, no dia 20 de outubro de 1903, num barracão de madeira, coberto de zinco, na esquina das ruas José Bonifácio e São Sebastião, começou a funcionar o Antigo Banco Construtor, da firma Diederichsen & Hibbeln, explorando os ramos de serraria e fundição, tendo anexa uma seção de mecânica. Com o trabalho dos sócios e o desenvolvimento da economia, os negócios se ampliaram e, em 1912, a parte pesada da serraria foi transferida para a Vila Tibério, permanecendo, no antigo local, apenas o maquinário de desdobro e aparelhamento. Com o pessimismo da primeira guerra mundial, em 1916, houve a dissolução da sociedade com Hibbeln, que recebeu a sua parte, parte em dinheiro e o restante em títulos no prazo de 6 anos. Nessa ocasião, Diederichsen chamou os seus auxiliares mais diretos: Manoel Penna, Camilo Luttenschlager, José Gonçalves Barbosa, Germano Rainel da Silva e Guido Gambini , pedindo-lhes que cooperassem, dando-lhes parte na sociedade. Em um ano foi paga a parte de Hibbeln. Foram feitas ampliações em 1920 e em 1923. Em 1924, foi aumentado o número de interessados, sendo convocados para o gozo dessas regalias os antigos auxiliares João Marzola, Adauto de Almeida, Paulo João Ferrero e Henrique Pierotti, sendo que o quadro foi aumentando até atingir o número de 22. Em 1932, a empresa foi nomeada inspetora da Sul América de Capitalização, ficando com uma das maiores carteiras de títulos da “Sulacap” do interior do Brasil. De fundição, serraria e ferragens, a empresa foi desenvolvendo novos produtos, como o departamento de venda de carros “Ford”, o posto de serviço e a oficina mecânica de automóveis. Posteriormente foram introduzidas as vendas de louças, artigos para presentes e para o lar, materiais e aparelhos elétricos, de uso doméstico. Em retribuição ao muito que recebeu da cidade, o fundador fez construir no centro o edifício “Diederichsen”, inaugurado em 1936. Em 1939, em reconhecimento ao trabalho de Manoel Penna, ajudando-o na consolidação da empresa, Diederichsen lhe deu sociedade direta, constituindo-se, então, a firma Antônio Diederichsen & Cia. Tendo a transformação trazido novo impulso às atividades comerciais, houve a necessidade de maior espaço e, assim, foi construído o edifício “ABC”, inaugurado em 21 de setembro de 1941. Ainda em agradecimento à cidade, e considerando a necessidade de um hotel, a empresa deliberou construir o “Umuarama”, inaugurado em 20 de janeiro de 1951, o qual, por muitos anos, esteve arrendado para João Constantino Miloná. Texto da Plataforma Verri adaptado para o blog por mim.

"Não Perturbe o Sossego Alheio"


 


"Não Perturbe o Sossego Alheio" 
Fotografia

Nota do blog: Nunca é demais lembrar, respeitar é a regra.