sexta-feira, 1 de janeiro de 2021

Vista de Tivoli, Itália (View of Tivoli) - Joseph Vernet

 




Vista de Tivoli, Itália (View of Tivoli) - Joseph Vernet
Tivoli - Itália
Coleção privada
OST - 93x122



Joseph Vernet painted View of Tivoli when he returned to France in 1753, after spending more than twenty years in Italy. This is one of the artist’s masterpieces, from his best period. Called back to France by the Crown to paint his foremost work, the Ports of France series, Vernet pays tribute in this ambitious and poetic landscape to the Italy he loved and to which he would never return.
Few paintings of this stature by Vernet have appeared on the art market or at auction in recent years.
Joseph Vernet needs no introduction. He is uncontestably the greatest landscape painter of his generation, and even of the whole eighteenth century. His contemporaries recognised him as such and his reputation has not diminished over time. With his trailblazing vision of nature, he created a bridge between the great masters of classical landscape, Poussin and Claude Lorrain, and the Romanticism that was to come.
Born in 1714 in Avignon, he initially trained locally with the painter Philippe Sauvan (1697-1792) then probably in the studio of Jacques Viali (circa 1650-1745) in Aix-en-Provence. His talent was soon spotted by the Marquis de Caumont, who sponsored him to continue his studies in Italy, where he arrived in November 1734. He remained for nearly two decades, completing his training with Adrien Manglard (1695-1760) and finding inspiration in the examples of Claude Lorrain and Salvator Rosa.
Success came to him quickly and he found a select and wealthy clientele among the British aristocrats who were undertaking the Grand Tour as well as members of the French nobility who had settled in the Eternal City. These clients helped his reputation to grow rapidly beyond the borders of Italy. When he returned to France in 1753, the Crown tasked him with making a series of paintings of French ports: this was his most prestigious commission and it took him nearly fifteen years to complete, while simultaneously pursuing a brilliant career that had both official (he was received into the Académie de Peinture et de Sculpture in 1753) and commercial strands.
Vernet became the reference point throughout Europe for landscape and marine painting. Until his death in 1789, he continued to paint these wonderful landscapes, which were snapped up by wealthy European collectors.
This View of Tivoli is without question one of the most striking examples of his mature work and was painted when he was at the peak of his career, in 1753. This year was a decisive moment in the artist’s life and career, which no doubt partly explains its very high quality and its importance.
1753 was the year that Vernet found his maturity: it was the year his father died and the year he returned to France after twenty years in Italy. It was also the time when his art reached its apogee, just before he received his most distinguished commission, for the Ports of France.
The commission for the present work is precisely documented, since Vernet recorded it himself in his book of accounts, where his commissions are listed: under no. 47 he describes a painting four pieds wide (the width of the present painting) made for ‘M. Regni’, who paid 90 livres for it. Vernet in fact made the painting for François Régny (1706-1779), who was originally from Lyon and became consul of Genoa in 1756.
Régny’s painting was later engraved by Pietro Martini (1738-1797) in the 1770s (see L. Lagrange, op. cit., p. 475), together with its pendant. The two engravings were given imagined titles: View of Spoleto for the present work and View of Porto Ercole for the pendant.
The two paintings subsequently entered the collection of M. Leboeuf, who sold them in 1783 for the very good price of 12,000 livres. They were then added to the collection of François-Antoine Robit and later to the even more distinguished collection of the Duc de Berry. The two pendant paintings were separated in 1837, when the duke sold part of his collection. The second painting has not since resurfaced.
There are few sites that have been depicted at a given time as often as Tivoli was by the artists of the eighteenth century. Around thirty kilometres from Rome, it combined in one place many elements that appealed to landscape painters: a craggy, picturesque panorama, with a village perched at the top of high cliffs, two dramatic waterfalls (the Grand Cascade and the lesser Cascatelle), as well as some memorable Roman ruins, the Maecenas Villa, and the celebrated rotunda Temple of Vesta, situated at the edge of the precipice.
The spectacular character of the ensemble was certainly not lost on Joseph Vernet, who from 1737 returned to Tivoli many times to paint or draw the scenery. His usual practice was to use all the works he produced on site as visual points of reference when he returned to his studio to paint a large canvas of Tivoli. He revisited the subject many times, certainly as a result of commissions from his clients, but probably also because of his own personal preference. There is no doubt whatsoever that the present View of Tivoli is one of the most accomplished and original of these paintings.
Vernet chose to take a step back from the topographic reality of the place, in order to render the picturesque and sublime qualities of the site on the smaller space offered by the canvas. Bringing together various elements that are geographically further apart in reality, Vernet gave himself great freedom and poetic licence, creating an ambitious harmony between topographical accuracy and his monumental vision of nature.
He went further, choosing to create an imaginary location out of two separate places: Tivoli, which dominates in this composition, but also the city of Spoleto, from which he seems to have borrowed some elements that would enhance the picturesque qualities of his vision, including the Ponte delle Torri on the left and the wide access ramp to the village on the right. These minor borrowings explain why, when Pietro Martini made an engraving of Vernet’s painting some decades later, he called it View of Spoleto rather than View of Tivoli, the title which – despite the engraving – Vernet’s painting was always given in early literature.
The idyllic atmosphere that reigns in this work is intensified by the painter’s incomparable pictorial technique and his masterly ability to render elements of nature – above all the water, from the turbulent cascade to the calmer waters in the foreground, as well as the magnificent detail of the rising mist at the foot of the cliffs, but also the sky, with its subtle rendering of the different colours and nuances of the setting sun. Strangely, it was sometimes thought that the painting showed a morning scene (notably in the 1783 sale). But the warm colours and pink tones in the sky on the right, casting a gentle, slightly tawny light over the town, leave no room for doubt. Further evidence is provided by the fishermen in the foreground, bringing in their nets, their basket full of the day’s catch. This is certainly an evening scene.
Using his freedom as a painter to transform the setting, Vernet has created one of the most magnificent compositions of his repertory, both powerful and delicate, realistic and original. The artist is inviting us to join him on a stroll, to visit his painting as though visiting the landscape itself. As we gaze upon this view of Tivoli, we are transported into the idyllic Italy that Vernet loved so much – an Italy reimagined by the artist and idealised through his vision. The year is 1753, when Vernet left the country never to return. Did he have a hunch that he would never go back while he was painting this work? It is certainly true that it is one of first he painted after his return to France: it suggests a splendid farewell and an astonishing tribute to the country he loved so deeply, the source of so much of his inspiration.

O Gabinete do Advogado (The Lawyer's Cabinet) - Dirck van Delen



O Gabinete do Advogado (The Lawyer's Cabinet) - Dirck van Delen
Coleção privada
Óleo sobre painel - 44x53

Out of the public eye for over hundred years, and once part of the famous Steengracht van Duivenvoorde-collection, this wonderful atmospheric panel is one of Van Delen’s most accomplished paintings. To this attest also the fact that he has added his name and the date of the painting, 1642, quite extravagantly on the richly decorated wooden fronton, crowned by angels holding a laurel wreath above the doorway on the left.
In a high-ceilinged elegantly paneled room with a black and white-chequered floor, the office of a lawyer, an elegant lady discusses a dossier to a lawyer (or possibly notary). Two commoners await their turn and through the open door another richly dressed lady holding a fan is approaching. To the right a clerk is writing up papers while two servants deliver goods such as a hare into a basket. Two children are chasing each other in the front, with a boy holding a mask, as a kind of repoussoir pulling our eye towards the central plan.
At least two paintings, near contemporary, can be discerned above the paneling in the room: a what could be a panoramic, large Hercules Seghers landscape in the centre, and to the right, more difficult to discern, a work depicting a possible sorceress.
The fanciful architecture of the room, inventively combining rich Baroque motifs, such as the sculpted wooden reliefs and the carefully worked out room details, is minutely rendered and possesses the glossy finish typical of Van Delen’s best works from the early 1640s. The subtle treatment of the light, such as that flooding in from the tall windows on the right, silhouetting the two children playing in the foreground, creates masterful chiaroscuro that enhances the atmosphere of the scene. Van Delen has composed this picture in a doubtless conscious evocation of a stage set: in fact the space depicted becomes cogent as if seen through an invisible proscenium arch, the foreground – and presumably us the audience – in shadow, with the actors illuminated theatrically by the strong daylight from the right. It is tempting to assume that Van Delen had in mind the Peasant Lawyer composition by Pieter Brueghel the Younger (1564-1636) – given the numbers in which these were produced, it is likely that Van Delen would have been familiar with them. Though set in much more humble surroundings, Brueghel’s organization of his scene offers a clear prototype, with the lawyer seated at his desk at the right, promissory notes and other paperwork pinned to the wall beyond, and clients or supplicants, including an old man leaning on a stick, another holding his hat respectfully and a third bringing produce as payment, having entered from a doorway to the left. Both artists present a moment in a theatrical narrative, although their pictorial technique is so different that it is hard to believe that Pieter Brueghel the Younger was painting his Peasant Lawyer pictures twenty years and less before Van Delen’s masterpiece: they seem to belong to different centuries, and in terms of their pictorial tradition, they do. Different too is the richly attired couple seen in an alcove occupying the centre of the back of the room in Van Delen’s painting. One wonders if they might be having a betrothal agreement drawn up.
Active in the city of Arnemuiden near Middelburg, Dirck van Delen specialized in these highly polished renditions of imaginary architectural scenes and, very much in the practice of the day, he joined forces with various figure painters to populate his grand interiors. His collaboration with Dirck Hals in Haarlem and with the Delft artist Anthonie Palamedesz. (1602-1673) is well documented; the lively figures in the present panel are probably the latter painter’s skillful work.
As often during this period, Van Delen and Palamedesz. have probably been inspired by several iconographic sources. Thus, the centre of the composition, with the figures of the lawyers and the main protagonists, is clearly related to the engraving by Abraham Bosse.

A Colheita de Vinho (The Wine Harvest) - David Teniers






A Colheita de Vinho (The Wine Harvest) - David Teniers
Coleção privada
OST - 142x267



São Francisco de Assis em Êxtase (Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy) - Doménikos Theotokópoulos El Greco





São Francisco de Assis em Êxtase (Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy) - Doménikos Theotokópoulos El Greco
Coleção privada
OST - 72x54

Of all the Christian Saints it was the founder of the Franciscan Order that El Greco depicted on the greatest number of occasions and with whom the artist’s work is most closely identified. Such was the popularity of the Saint during El Greco’s lifetime that in Toledo alone there were three Franciscan monasteries, including the great San Juan de los Reyes, and a further seven religious institutions dedicated to Saint Francis.
El Greco painted some eleven treatments relating to the life of Saint Francis, many of which exist in several autograph and numerous studio versions. The present painting, however, is one of only three autograph versions of this rarely seen composition by the Greek master. The two other works, published by Wethey as El Greco and studio and dated circa 1590–95, are a painting (oil on canvas, 75 x 57 cm.) in the Musée des Beaux-Arts, Pau, and another (oil on canvas, 110 x 87 cm.) that originally hung in the Capilla de San José in Toledo, which then passed into the collection of the Conde de Guendulain y del Vado, Toledo (when published by Wethey), before being subsequently sold to a North American private collector during the 1990s. It seems likely that all three versions reflect a lost original entirely by the hand of the master.
Wethey also lists nine school versions, only two of which are from the artist’s workshop, whilst the remainder include a copy by Blas Muñoz (signed and dated 1683), today in the Casa del Greco, Toledo, and two later copies in the Academia de San Carlos, Mexico and the Museo de Arte, Sao Paulo, attesting to the enduring popularity of the design.
In common with the majority of the artist’s treatment of the subject, El Greco has created a design of great simplicity in which the Saint is depicted in three-quarter length, with only minimal details to the landscape, a skull – a symbol of man's mortality – placed prominently in the left foreground, with the Saint gazing in ecstasy to the divine light emanating from above. The palette is restricted to a predominance of greys and browns, to add further to the sobriety of the scene and create an ascetic, humble depiction of the Saint that conformed to the spirit of the Counter Reformation, following the Council of Trent (1545–1563) that denounced the excessive adornment of religious imagery.
The present work is close in handling to the version formerly in the Capilla de San José, Toledo, which Wethey gives to El Greco and workshop. The aqueous treatment of the eyes, the use of carmine to the lips, the black outlining of areas such as the hands, the beautiful draughtsmanship and modelling to the skull, the impressionistic brushwork to the habit and freely sketched background are all stylistically consistent with the work of El Greco, as are also the distinctive marks close to the centre right margin where the artist has cleaned his brush during execution of the work.

Santa Maria della Salute e Entrada do Grande Canal, Veneza, Itália (Venice, Santa Maria della Salute and the Entrance to the Grand Canal) - Gaspar van Wittel



 

Santa Maria della Salute e Entrada do Grande Canal, Veneza, Itália (Venice, Santa Maria della Salute and the Entrance to the Grand Canal) - Gaspar van Wittel
Veneza - Itália
Coleção privada
OST - 47x77



Although perhaps not single-handedly responsible, as the great Italian scholar Giulio Briganti claimed, for ‘inaugurating the history of Venetian views’, there is no doubt that the young Netherlander Gaspar van Wittel was of seminal importance in their development. While he spent much of his life in Rome, where he had settled around 1674 and was known as Vanvitelli, he visited Venice on at least one occasion, probably in 1695, and the drawings he made there form the basis for what may be considered among the very first real Venetian vedute or view paintings. There are three such drawings which are preparatory for this composition, which depicts the entrance to the Grand Canal and constitutes one of the most famous of all Venetian vistas. Known to scholars previously only from photographs and thus unseen in public for over fifty years, this elegant painting epitomizes Vanvitelli’s detailed and colourful style. Although his Venetian views such as this were not numerous in type, Vanvitelli’s compositions exercised a profound influence on the succeeding generation of painters of vedute, among them Canaletto and Francesco Guardi.
The view is taken from the centre of the Grand Canal, looking west along it with the great church of Santa Maria della Salute, Baldassare Longhena’s Baroque masterpiece begun in 1631, dominating the left side of the composition. Behind this stands the Gothic Abbey of San Gregorio with its distinctive crested gable. Alongside the abbey can be glimpsed the tower of the Palazzo Venier delle Torreselle, built in the fifteenth century but destroyed in the eighteenth, and the Palazzo Venier dei Leoni. In the background, on the bend of the canal, can be see the campanile of the Church of the Carità, also now destroyed. On the facing side of the Grand Canal we see the Palazzo Corner, today the seat of the Venetian Prefecture, and nearer to us, the Palazzo Tiepolo. The façade of the Salute is bathed in sunlight, and the whole scene is depicted in a clear and even light, with the bustling waterway of the Grand Canal itself alive with gondolas, barges and other craft of all types and sizes.
The exact dates or the length of time spent by Vanvitelli in Venice are not known for certain. According to his biographer Lione Pascoli, writing in the eighteenth century, he stayed briefly in the city in 1677 on his way to Rome. Later it seems that he travelled through Northern Italy on two different occasions; first in 1690 and then in 1694; either of these could have included a stay in Venice although the latter seems more likely. On both occasions he travelled to numerous cities – Florence, Bologna, and Verona amongst others – spending a few months in each place, drawing and painting views there. According to Pascoli, he continued north after staying in Bologna in December 1694, probably arriving in Venice the following spring. In any case, a secure terminus ante quem for Vanvitelli’s presence in Venice is provided by a View of the Molo in the Prado in Madrid, which is signed and dated 1697. Briganti listed six preparatory drawings of Venetian subjects, and at least forty paintings have survived. The last of Vanvitelli’s dated views of Venice is from 1721 (private collection, Prague), and both this and another of 1717 (location unknown) are clearly inscribed stating that they were executed in Rome, probably from drawings done by the artist in situ many years earlier.
In the case of the present painting, no less than three preliminary drawings for this composition have survived. All are today preserved in the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale Vittorio Emmanuele in Rome and provide an important insight into Vanvitelli’s working methods. Although Laureati does not indicate a date for them, they are very likely related to Vanvitelli’s visit made to the city in 1694–95. The viewpoint is low and must have been taken from a boat near the entrance to the Grand Canal. In the first two drawings, in pen and ink and wash, Vanvitelli carefully defines the details of the architecture, before subsequently adding grey washes in order to establish the requisite areas of light and shadow. In the third and smallest drawing, partly drawn in red chalk, he makes some final detailed adjustments to the perspective in certain areas. All three drawings are squared for transfer and formed the basis for a group of some seven paintings of the same view, all with minor variations in the disposition of the gondolas and other craft as well as the figures. Three (and probably four) of these are of very similar dimensions to the present painting (roughly 45 x 75 cm.): in addition to the present work these are in the Alte Pinakothek in Munich, a private collection, and those sold Cologne, Lempertz, in 2001, and London, Christie’s, in 2003. Of these, two, those in Munich and that sold at Lempertz, are painted on copper, and the remainder on canvas. A larger canvas is recorded by Briganti in the Colonna Gallery in Rome, and a smaller gouache is preserved at Holkham Hall in Norfolk. Only two of the group are dated: the earliest is the copper in Munich, which is dated 1706, and the latest that sold at Christie’s, which is dated 1710 and inscribed ‘Roma’, indicating that it was painted from the drawings after Vanvitelli’s return to Rome. Of the group only the present canvas, that in a private collection and that sold at Lempertz are not known to have had pendants. That in Munich was paired with a View of the Molo, Piazzetta and Palazzo Ducale, the Colonna canvas with a Piazzetta from the Bacino di San Marco, the ex-Christie’s view with a View of San Giorgio Maggiore, while the Holkham gouache formed part of a set of four views including Tevere a San Giovanni dei Fiorentini, The Palazzo Farnese from Caprarola, and The Darsena in Naples.

Os Cartazes da Luta (Fracassada) da URSS Contra o Alcoolismo - Artigo


"Nem Uma Gota"


"Seu Mundo Interior"


 "Não Sou Eu Que Sou Amado Pela Mamãe"


"Vamos Expulsar os Bêbados do Ambiente de Trabalho"


"Passagem Para Outro Mundo"


"Ficou Bêbado, Estragado, Quebrou a Árvore. Está Com Vergonha de Olhar as Pessoas no Rosto"


"Ou [o Bebê], ou [a Vodca]"


“E Falam que Nós Somos os Porcos”


"É Hora de Acabar Com a Festa”


“Socialmente Perigoso”


“Pare, Antes que Seja Tarde”



Os Cartazes da Luta (Fracassada) da URSS Contra o Alcoolismo - Artigo
Artigo



Hoje, em média, o russo bebe menos que o alemão ou o francês. Segundo a Organização Mundial da Saúde, o consumo de álcool na Rússia caiu 43% desde 2003, graças a uma série de medidas do governo, como a proibição de venda de bebidas após as 23h, aumento do preço mínimo para o consumidor e campanhas em prol de um estilo de vida mais saudável.
Parece surpreendente. E é mesmo. A fama de nação bêbada tem respaldo histórico.
Alcoolismo é um drama de saúde pública há séculos na Rússia. Efeito colateral do protagonismo que a vodca tem na economia do país desde antes de o império se consolidar. Em 1478, o governo tirou o domínio da Igreja sobre a produção e iniciou o processo de monopolização da bebida, o que se consolidou sob o reinado de Ivan, o Terrível (1530-84).
A vodca foi o primeiro produto industrial de massa russo. Mais que isso, ela deu o impulso necessário para Ivan, que adotou o título de czar, colocar em prática o projeto de uma nação russa, centrada em Moscou.
O monopólio deu certo, porque beber fazia parte da vida das pessoas. Os vários tipos de vinho de cereal, como a vodca era chamada, estavam no cotidiano. Russos bebiam em negociações. Bebiam na colheita. Na falta de dinheiro, pagavam em bebida. Subornavam em bebida. A mulher entrou em trabalho de parto? Vodca. Bebê não para de chorar? Vodca goela abaixo que é para acalmar.
Nada muito diferente do que outros povos faziam na mesma época, mas os russos se destacavam no quesito. A popularização do destilado no cotidiano criou uma permanente classe de bêbados e contribuiu inclusive com o aumento de incêndios no país.
Não que a Rússia seja há 500 anos um país exclusivo de pinguços, é evidente. As posições sóbrias da Igreja Ortodoxa Russa ecoavam nos discursos da temperança, movimento antiálcool que cresceu bastante no fim do século 19, com o apoio de algumas da mentes mais brilhantes do país.
"A vodca é uma bebida incolor que pinta seu nariz de vermelho e enegrece sua reputação", declarou Anton Tchekhov. Fiódor Dostoievski, filho de um alcoólatra, escreveu que "o consumo de bebidas alcoólicas brutaliza o homem e o transforma em um selvagem". Já o outrora bêbado contumaz Leon Tolstoi escreveu sobre os malefícios do álcool e criou, em 1887, a Liga Contra a Embriaguez.
Em 1914, com o país em crise e o czar Nicolau 2º desacreditado, o governo decretou a Lei Seca, a primeira do gênero na história. Com soldados sóbrios, o país teria melhores condições para entrar na Primeira Guerra Mundial. Além disso, com o conflito, o povo voltou a se unir e apoiar o czar.
Não por muito tempo. Com a Lei Seca, secou também o dinheiro que abastecia os cofres estatais com o monopólio de álcool. Faltaram investimentos nas forças mobilizadas para a guerra e na infraestrutura do país. O povo se revoltou, a Rússia apanhou em combate, a revolução estourou. A vodca acelerou a queda do czarismo.
Os líderes da Revolução Russa condenavam o álcool e mantiveram a proibição. Mas, em 1924, a União Soviética, país criado dois anos antes, retomou a produção, dando início a uma nova era de monopólio. Em 1943, após a vitória sobre os nazistas na Batalha de Stalingrado, o Exército Vermelho passou a dar uma ração diária de vodca aos soldados.
No começo, quem não bebia optava por chocolate, mas em 1945 o hábito já era tão comum entre as tropas que recusar a dose podia ser visto como insubordinação. Como toda a população masculina ativa da URSS estava no Exército, a bebedeira rapidamente voltou à rotina e se tornou uma constante nos anos socialistas.
Uma das primeiras medidas da Perestroika, o movimento de reformas liderado por Mikhail Gorbachev a partir de 1985, foi lançar uma forte campanha antiálcool. O problema, segundo os críticos, é que a medida mirou a produção de vodca, e não a saúde pública. Fazendas foram dissolvidas e destilarias, quebradas.
Sobrou para a economia nacional, pois a vodca ainda era monopólio estatal, responsável por cerca de 25% do orçamento do governo. A produção de samogon (destilado clandestino e muitas vezes tóxico) voltou a crescer, detonando a saúde da população, que recorria até a fluido de geladeira para se entorpecer.
Com o colapso soviético, a Rússia ressurgiu como um país em 1991, comandada por Boris Yeltsin. O novo presidente seria uma das grandes figuras políticas globais da década, porém, com o passar dos anos, isso se devia mais a uma imagem folclórica do que de liderança. Yeltsin aparecia em eventos visivelmente bêbado e teria problemas graves com alcoolismo.
Nos anos soviéticos, houve diversas campanhas de conscientização e combate ao consumo excessivo de álcool no país. Muitas vinham munidas de cartazes produzidos pela cultuada escola do design gráfico russo.

Vista Aérea do Estádio Municipal / Pacaembu, Década de 50, São Paulo, Brasil


 

Vista Aérea do Estádio Municipal / Pacaembu, Década de 50, São Paulo, Brasil
São Paulo - SP
Fotografia 

Rio Tamanduateí, 1903, São Paulo, Brasil


 

Rio Tamanduateí, 1903, São Paulo, Brasil
São Paulo - SP
Fotografia

Vista de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil


 



Vista de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil
Salvador - BA
Baraúna Fotógrafo
Fotografia - Cartão Postal

Nota do blog: Data não obtida / Crédito para Baraúna Fotógrafo.

Praça Clóvis Bevilácqua, Anos 40, São Paulo, Brasil


 

Praça Clóvis Bevilácqua, Anos 40, São Paulo, Brasil 
São Paulo - SP
Fotografia