A Ruela, Delft, Holanda (Gezicht op Huizen in Delft, Bekend als Het Straatje / View of Houses in Delft, Known as The Little Street) - Johannes Vermeer
Delft - Holanda
Rijksmuseum Amsterdã Holanda
OST - 54x44 - 1657-1661
The Little
Street (Het Straatje) is a painting by the Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer, executed c. 1657–58. It is exhibited at
the Rijksmuseum of Amsterdam, and signed, below the window in the lower left-hand
corner, "I V MEER".
The painting
is made in oil on canvas, and it is a relatively small painting, being 54.3
centimetres (21.4 in) high by 44.0 centimetres (17.3 in) wide.
The painting,
showing a quiet street, depicts a typical aspect of the life in a Dutch Golden Age town. It is one of only three Vermeer
paintings of views of Delft, the others being View of Delft and the now lost House Standing in
Delft. This painting is considered to be an important work of the Dutch
master.
Straight
angles alternate with the triangle of the house and of the sky giving the
composition a certain vitality. The walls, stones and brickwork are painted in
a thicker paint layer, such that it makes them almost palpable.
While
generally agreed to depict a contemporary street scene in 17th-century Delft,
where Vermeer lived and worked, the exact location of the scene Vermeer painted
has long been a topic of research and discussion, with studies arguing for the
Voldersgracht, where the Vermeer Centre is located, or the Nieuwe Langendijk at
the present-day numbers 22 to 26.
In 2015,
archival research based on the city's quay dues register, which gives detailed
measurements of all houses and passageways along the canals of Delft at the
time, has resulted in the conclusion that the site is the Vlamingstraat, a
street with a narrow canal, at the present-day numbers 40 and 42. The
research also found that the property on the right in the painting belonged to
Vermeer’s aunt, Ariaentgen Claes van der Minne. She had a business selling
tripe, and the passageway beside the house was known as the Penspoort, or
Tripe Gate. Vermeer’s mother and sister also lived on the same canal,
diagonally opposite.
In 2017, this
apparently sound conclusion was disputed by art historians Gert Eijkelboom and
Gerrit Vermeer in the Dutch Journal of Historical Geography (Tijdschrift
voor historische geografie). Their argumentation is essentially founded in the
assertion that the painting does not depict an actual place, and thus cannot be
accurately located. The authors said: "We do not know whether the question
will ever be answered, because it seems that Vermeer's world-famous work is an
allegorical representation, which he compiled from various elements and
places."
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário