Aurora Boreal (Aurora Borealis) - Frederic Edwin Church
Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington D.C. Estados Unidos
OST - 142x212 - 1865
A aurora polar é um fenômeno óptico composto
de um brilho observado nos céus noturnos nas regiões polares, em decorrência do impacto de
partículas de vento
solar com a alta atmosfera da Terra, canalizadas pelo campo magnético terrestre. Em latitudes do hemisfério norte é conhecida como aurora
boreal (nome batizado por Galileu
Galilei em 1619, em referência à deusa romana do
amanhecer, Aurora, e Bóreas, deus
grego, representante dos ventos nortes). A ocorrência deste fenômeno depende da
atividade das fulgurações solares. Em latitudes do hemisfério
sul é conhecida como aurora austral, nome batizado por James Cook,
uma referência direta ao fato de estar ao Sul.
O fenômeno não é exclusivo somente ao planeta Terra, sendo também
observável em outros planetas do sistema
solar como Júpiter, Saturno, Marte e Vênus. Da mesma maneira, o fenômeno não é
exclusivo da natureza, sendo também reproduzível artificialmente através
de explosões nucleares ou em laboratório.
Aurora Borealis is an 1865 painting by Frederic Edwin Church of the aurora
borealis and the Arctic expedition of Isaac Israel Hayes. The painting measures 142.3
by 212.2 centimetres (56.0 in × 83.5 in) and is now owned by
the Smithsonian American Art Museum.
Aurora Borealis is based on two separate sketches. The
first incident was an aurora witnessed by Church's pupil, the Arctic explorer Isaac I. Hayes. Hayes provided a sketch and
description of the aurora borealis display he witnessed one January evening.
Coinciding with Hayes' furthest northern movement into what he named Cape
Leiber, the aurora borealis appeared over the peak.
Describing the event, Hayes wrote:
“The light grew by degrees more and more intense, and from
irregular bursts it settled into an almost steady sheet of brightness... The
exhibition, at first tame and quiet, became in the end startling in its
brilliancy. The broad dome above me is all ablaze... The colour of the light
was chiefly red, but this was not constant, and every hue mingled in the fierce
display. Blue and yellow streamers were playing in the lurid fire; and,
sometimes starting side by side from the wide expanse of the illuminated arch,
they melt into each other, and throw a ghostly glare of green into the face and
over the landscape. Again this green overrides the red; blue and orange clasp
each other in their rapid flight; violet darts tear through a broad flush of
yellow, and countless tongues of white flame, formed of these uniting streams,
rush aloft and lick the skies.”
The iconography of the painting suggested personal and
nationalistic references. The peak in the painting had been named after Church
during Hayes's expedition. Aurora Borealis incorporated details of
Hayes' ship, drawn from a sketch he brought back upon returning from his
expedition. Contrasted with Church's earlier painting of the north, The
Icebergs (1861), the intact ship highlights Hayes' achievement in
navigating this space, as well as the state of the nation in navigating the
contentious historical moment. Presenting the ship's safe passage through the
dark Arctic environment, Church suggested optimism for the future; a tiny light
shines out from the ship's window.
Charles Millard describes Church's paintings as "large in
scale and size, sharply horizontal in format" and "dramatic in
subject, but yielding in execution, and tend[ing] to exploit both value
contrast and continuous tonal transition." Church's works, including Aurora
Borealis, were completed using small touches of pigment built together through
thin applications, leaving the viewer unaware of fracture between strokes.
These works are also built around the tones of "ochre, brown, gray going
to blue or green, and green" at the expense of the full value of color.
Completed in New York that winter, Aurora Borealis was
exhibited publicly in London in 1865 as a triumvirate with two paintings by
Church of Ecuadoran volcanoes: Cotopaxi (his 1862 painting of an
eruption) and Chimborazo (his 1864 reprise of the dormant mountain
that had been the subject of his 1858 masterwork Heart of the Andes).
Created at the end of the American Civil War, Aurora Borealis (1865)
was believed to depict the portent of a simultaneously triumphant and
desolate Union victory, its meaning
amplified in relation to later works, including The After Glow (1867)
and other works.
Aurora Borealis (1865) was associated with Rainy
Season in the Tropics (1866) for two reasons. First, the two paintings
marked the completion of the arctic-tropical sequence created with The Heart of the Andes (1859) and The
North, also known as The Icebergs (1861). These pairings drew together
popular attention on exploration of the arctic North and the tropical South.
The second association between Aurora Borealis and Rainy Season
in the Tropics was established through their compositions and "in
their luminosity", where each suggested a "renewed optimism in
natural and historic events".
Under a dark Arctic sky, polar explorer Isaac Israel Hayes's
ship, the SS United States, lies frozen in the pack ice at the base of a
looming cliff. The auroras above erupt in a cascade of eerie lights, while the
dogsled implies the hope of rescue from this icy prison. Hayes and
Frederic Church were friends, and upon Hayes's return from the Arctic in 1861,
he gave Church his sketches as inspiration for this painting. When Hayes
returned to New York, the country was in the thick of civil war and, in a
rousing speech, he vowed that "God willing, I trust yet to carry the flag
of the great Republic, with not a single star erased from its glorious Union,
to the extreme Northern limits of the earth."
During the Civil War, the auroras--usually visible only in the
north---were widely interpreted as signs of God's displeasure with the
Confederacy for advocating slavery, and of the high moral stakes attached to a
Union victory. Viewers understood that Church's painting of the Aurora Borealis
(also known as the northern lights) alluded to this divine omen relating to the
unresolved conflict.
The Civil War defined America and forever changed American art. American artists of this era could not depict the conflict using the conventions of European history painting, which glamorized the hero on the battlefield. Instead, America's finest painters captured the transformative impact of the war. Through landscapes and genre paintings, these artists gave voice to the nation's highest ideals and deepest concerns — illustrating a time that has been described as the second American Revolution.
The Civil War defined America and forever changed American art. American artists of this era could not depict the conflict using the conventions of European history painting, which glamorized the hero on the battlefield. Instead, America's finest painters captured the transformative impact of the war. Through landscapes and genre paintings, these artists gave voice to the nation's highest ideals and deepest concerns — illustrating a time that has been described as the second American Revolution.


Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário